Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedCivil Case No. 18 of 2013· [2017] KEELC 2672 (KLR)

Brek Sulum Hemed v Constituency Development Fund Board & another [2017] KEELC 2672 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 May 2017
1,189 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that parties joined to a lawsuit can counterclaim against new parties—including the original plaintiff—without needing court permission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa (Ruling No. 2 in Civil Case No. 18 of 2013) determined a preliminary objection by the plaintiff, Brek Sulum Hemed, seeking to strike out a defence and counterclaim filed by 18 necessary parties joined to the suit by the court's order of 25 February 2014. The plaintiff objected that the counterclaim was fatally defective because it joined strangers to the suit without leave and misjoined the plaintiff as a defendant in his own suit. The necessary parties relied on Order 7 rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The court, per Edward M. Muriithi J, examined Order 1 rule 10(2), which permits joinder of necessary parties, and Order 7 rules 8-12, which govern counterclaims. It held that upon joinder the necessary parties became defendants with all the rights of defendants, including the right to file a defence and counterclaim adding other persons as defendants to the counterclaim, with a further title similar to a plaint naming them. The court rejected the preliminary objection in its entirety, declined the plaintiff's objection, and awarded costs in the cause. The judgment was dated and delivered on 30 May 2017.

Key legal issues

#
01

Joinder of additional parties by way of counterclaim

Holding

A defendant joined as a necessary party may, under Order 7 rules 8-12 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, add persons not party to the suit as defendants to a counterclaim without separate leave

Reasoning

The court held that Order 7 rule 8 requires a defendant raising a counterclaim that raises questions with the plaintiff and other persons to add a further title similar to a plaint naming those persons. Rule 9 provides for summoning persons not party to the suit. The preliminary objection misapprehended these provisions and failed.

p. 3
02

Naming the plaintiff as defendant in his own suit's counterclaim

Holding

A counterclaim creates a cross-action in which the plaintiff may properly be named as a defendant together with others

Reasoning

The court found no procedural bar to the plaintiff being named a defendant in the counterclaim, since the counterclaim is a cross-action with its own title in the form of a plaint. The objection that the plaintiff could not be a defendant in his own suit was rejected as contrary to the express scheme of Order 7.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Upon joinder, necessary parties assume the character of defendants with all rights of a defendant, including the right to file a defence and counterclaim adding other parties under Order 7 rules 8-12 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's Preliminary Objection is declined
  2. 2.Costs in the Cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 1 rule 10(2)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 7 rules 8-12
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 7 rule 8
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159
Jurisdiction invoked
Not stated in the judgment; decided under the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Brek Sulum Hemed v Constituency Development Fund Board & another [2017] KEELC 2672 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Civil Case No. 18 of 2013. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/2672/eng@2017-05-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.