Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedE.L.C. Case No. 14 of 2017 (Formerly Kerugoya ELC No. 50 of 2012 & Embu HCC 134 of 2008)· [2017] KEELC 2109 (KLR)

Nicholas Ireri Jacob & another v Njeru Karugano & another [2017] KEELC 2109 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
27 July 2017
2,776 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court cancelled a fraudulent land title and returned the property to its rightful clan-allocated owner, with costs against both defendants.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 2nd Plaintiff, John Miriti Jacob, sued for cancellation of Title No. Kagaari/Gitare/T.160 registered in the name of the 1st Defendant and thereafter transferred in 2001 as a 'gift' to the 2nd Defendant, and for registration of himself as proprietor. He pleaded beneficial ownership through clan allocation in 1961 to his father, a Gicubu clan elder, and alleged fraudulent registration of the 1st Defendant in 1978. Both Defendants filed bare denials. At trial the 2nd Plaintiff called four witnesses, including the clan secretary (PW 2) who confirmed from the clan register that the plot was allocated to the 2nd Plaintiff as a child, and a CID officer who produced an investigation report into the alleged fraud. The 1st Defendant claimed the Lands Office had erroneously registered him in place of 'Muriithi Jacob' and that he transferred the plot to the 2nd Defendant to rectify the mistake; the 2nd Defendant claimed he discovered his allocation only around 2000. The court framed four issues: rightful ownership, fraud, entitlement to relief and costs. It found the Plaintiffs' evidence credible and corroborated, rejected the Defendants' account as incredible and unpleaded, and held that the initial registration and the gift transfer were both dishonest and fraudulent. Judgment was entered for the 2nd Plaintiff: the title in the 2nd Defendant's name was ordered cancelled and the property registered in the 2nd Plaintiff's name, with costs against both Defendants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Rightful ownership of Title No. Kagaari/Gitare/T.160

Holding

The 2nd Plaintiff is the rightful owner; his name was misspelt as Muriithi Jacob instead of Miriti Jacob by the Lands Office

Reasoning

The court accepted the 2nd Plaintiff's evidence, corroborated by the clan register produced as exhibit P.2 and by PW 2, the Gicubu Clan secretary since 1960, who confirmed the plot was allocated to the 2nd Plaintiff as a child and that the 2nd Defendant's father was allocated land elsewhere. The Defendants' account - that the 2nd Defendant learned of his ownership 'from the blues' and that his father was unaware of any 1961 allocation - was found incredible, especially as the alleged ownership was never pleaded in the defence.

p. 4
02

Whether the property was fraudulently acquired by the 1st Defendant and fraudulently transferred to the 2nd Defendant

Holding

Both the initial registration of the 1st Defendant and the subsequent 2001 gift transfer to the 2nd Defendant were dishonest and fraudulent

Reasoning

The green card showed the 1st Defendant as first registered owner on 14th July 1978 with no indication of any error on the register, and the 2001 transfer recorded consideration as a gift. The defence of Lands Office mistake was unsupported by any evidence from that office and was never pleaded. The court also discredited the 2nd Defendant, who admitted lying about his date of birth when obtaining his national ID card.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Costs follow the event and a successful party should be awarded costs unless there is good reason to order otherwise
  • If a Lands Office commits an error in registration, it is for that office to correct the error, not for a private citizen to transfer the property as a gift

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Cancellation of Title No. KAGAARI/GITARE/T.160 in the name of the 2nd Defendant
  2. 2.Registration of the suit property in the name of the 2nd Plaintiff, John Miriti Jacob
  3. 3.Costs of the suit awarded to the 2nd Plaintiff, to be paid by the 1st and 2nd Defendants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Registration of Persons ActCap 107
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (suit concerning title to land)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nicholas Ireri Jacob & another v Njeru Karugano & another [2017] KEELC 2109 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). E.L.C. Case No. 14 of 2017 (Formerly Kerugoya ELC No. 50 of 2012 & Embu HCC 134 of 2008). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/2109/eng@2017-07-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.