Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKerugoya Environment and Land Court Appeal (from Kerugoya Senior Principal Magistrate's Court Civil Case No. 109 of 2013)· [2017] KEELC 2080 (KLR)

Susan Wakuthii Kibata & another v Elizabeth Njoki Murage [2017] KEELC 2080 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 July 2017
2,917 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

If a Kenyan land sale agreement is void for lacking Land Control Board consent, the buyer gets back only the money paid—no interest, no damages.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal to the Kerugoya Environment and Land Court against the judgment of Hon. J. Kasam (SRM) in Kerugoya SPMC Civil Case No. 109 of 2013. By an agreement dated 27th July 2009, the Respondent agreed to sell ½ acre out of land parcel No. NGARIAMA/NGIRIAMBU/1367 - then registered in the name of her deceased mother with no confirmed grant - to the Appellants for Ksh. 180,000 (Ksh. 185,000 actually received). The Appellants took occupation but the sale was never completed. The trial magistrate found the agreement void for want of Land Control Board consent and awarded only a refund of Ksh. 185,000 with costs and interest of the suit, declining the contractual 40% p.a. interest and Ksh. 20,000 liquidated damages. The Appellants appealed on seven grounds, arguing the court could not re-write their contract. Justice B. N. Olao held that the transaction was void under Section 6 of the Land Control Act, and under Section 7 only the money paid is recoverable as a debt; courts cannot enforce illegal contracts, equity follows the law, and Article 159 cannot overlook the Land Control Act's express provisions. The sale also contravened Sections 45 and 82 of the Law of Succession Act on intermeddling with a deceased's estate before confirmation of grant. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Enforceability of the default clause (interest and liquidated damages) in a void land sale agreement

Holding

No interest or liquidated damages are payable; the vendor is liable only to refund the money paid as a debt under Section 7 of the Land Control Act

Reasoning

The sale of agricultural land without Land Control Board consent is void under Section 6 of the Land Control Act. Section 7 permits recovery only of money or consideration paid. Although parties are bound by their contracts, a court cannot enforce an illegal contract, and equity cannot override the law. Article 159 cannot be used to overlook the express provisions of the Land Control Act.

p. 4
02

Validity of sale of a deceased person's land before confirmation of grant

Holding

Such a sale is prohibited; the purchaser deals with the property at his own risk

Reasoning

Sections 45(1) and 82(b)(ii) of the Law of Succession Act prohibit disposal or intermeddling with free property of a deceased person before confirmation of grant. The land was still registered in the name of the Respondent's deceased mother when the agreement was executed, so the Respondent had no right to sell it, and the finding to that effect was correct.

p. 5
03

Duty of a trial magistrate to address authorities cited in submissions

Holding

While a court need not refer to all cited cases, it should give reasons where it declines to follow them; the magistrate nonetheless reached the right decision

Reasoning

Order 21 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules prescribes the content of judgments. Where a trial court appears not to have applied the cases referred to it, it should explain why, particularly where contrasting binding authorities are cited. However, the failure here was not fatal because the magistrate correctly applied Section 7 of the Land Control Act.

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a controlled transaction becomes void for lack of Land Control Board consent, only the money or consideration paid is recoverable as a debt under Section 7 of the Land Control Act, with no interest or damages
  • Courts will not enforce obligations arising out of an illegal or void contract
  • Equity cannot override the law; equity follows the law
  • No immovable property of a deceased person may be sold before confirmation of grant; a purchaser of such property does so at his own risk
  • A trial court should, where it does not follow cases cited to it, give reasons for not doing so

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the appeal are awarded to the Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Control ActSection 6
  • Land Control ActSection 7
  • Land Control ActSection 22
  • Law of Succession ActSection 45(1)
  • Law of Succession ActSection 45(2)(b)
  • Law of Succession ActSection 82(b)(ii)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 4
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)

Cases cited (7)

  • SELLE VS ASSOCIATED MOTOR BOAT COMPANY LTD
    1968 E.A 123
  • MORRIS MWITI MBURUGU VS DENNIS KIMANTHI M’MBURUGU
    Chuka High Court Succession Cause No. 43 of 2015
  • MURIUKI SAMSON MURIITHI & ANOTHER VS JAMES MWANGI GERALD & OTHERS
    Kerugoya Environment and Land Court Case No. 167 of 2015
  • MISTRY SINGH VS SERWANO WOFUNIRA KULUBYA
    1963 E.A 408
  • DAVID SIRONGA OLE TUKAI VS FRANCIS ARAP MUGE & OTHERS
    C.A Civil Appeal No. 76 of 2014 (2014 e K.L.R)
  • STANDARD CHARTERED BANK VS INTERCOM SERVICES LTD & OTHERS
    2004 e K.L.R
  • HOLMAN VS JOHNSON
    1775-1802 ALL E.R 98
On appeal from
Kerugoya Senior Principal Magistrate's Court
Civil Case No. 109 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Environment and Land Court from the Senior Principal Magistrate's Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Susan Wakuthii Kibata & another v Elizabeth Njoki Murage [2017] KEELC 2080 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Kerugoya Environment and Land Court Appeal (from Kerugoya Senior Principal Magistrate's Court Civil Case No. 109 of 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/2080/eng@2017-07-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.