Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC 108 of 2016 (O.S)· [2017] KEELC 1695 (KLR)

Al Mhala Swaleh & 4 others v Mohmamed M. Sheikh Ali & 12 others [2017] KEELC 1695 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
19 September 2017
3,591 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court dismissed an injunction against property owners, ruled a group can't sue through an unregistered self-help group without permission, and merged overlapping land cases.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The court dealt simultaneously with two applications in an adverse possession suit filed by members of Tuamkeni Self Help Group against the registered owners of Plot/Land Parcel Nos. 284/III/MN and subdivisions at Barani Kikambala, Kilifi. The Plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction restraining the Defendants from destroying structures, erecting fences, threatening eviction and trespassing, alleging use of police and goons to harass them. The Defendants opposed, contending the suit was an abuse of process given their earlier suit, Mombasa ELC No. 211 of 2014, over the same land; that Tuamkeni Self Help Group lacks legal capacity and the representative suit was filed without leave under Order 1 Rule 8; and that the 8th and 9th Defendants were deceased before filing. The Defendants cross-applied for striking out the suit, alternatively consolidation with ELC 211 of 2014, and striking out the deceased defendants. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs' injunction application, finding no prima facie case under the Nguruman/Giella principles and holding the suit intended to pre-empt the earlier case. It declined to strike out the whole suit, holding a representative action may be commenced without leave but not proceed without it, and granted 30 days to comply with Order 1 Rule 8. Applying Dawson (Bradford) Ltd v Dove, it struck out the deceased 8th and 9th Defendants as a nullity. It consolidated the suit with ELC 211 of 2014, directed pre-trial compliance before the Deputy Registrar within 45 days, and ordered the Plaintiffs to bear the costs of both applications.

Key legal issues

#
01

Threshold for interlocutory injunction

Holding

Plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, irreparable injury or balance of convenience; the application was also an abuse of process as it sought to pre-empt ELC 211 of 2014

Reasoning

The court applied the Nguruman restatement of the Giella principles. No material demonstrated the Plaintiffs had lived on the parcels for the claimed period, nor evidence of police harassment. The court found the suit intended to pre-empt the Defendants' earlier case, so granting orders would aid abuse of process.

p. 6
02

Representative suit without leave

Holding

The suit was improperly brought as a representative suit for an unincorporated group, but instead of striking out, the Plaintiffs were given 30 days to comply with Order 1 Rule 8

Reasoning

Order 1 Rule 8 requires notice to all represented persons; a party may file but not proceed without leave. Tuamkeni Self Help Group lacks legal capacity to sue, so interested members must individually apply to be joined under Order 1 Rule 8(3).

p. 7
03

Suit against deceased defendants

Holding

The names and causes of action against the 8th and 9th Defendants, who died before commencement of the suit, were struck out

Reasoning

Relying on Dawson (Bradford) Ltd v Dove, the court held proceedings against deceased persons were a nullity; the rules do not permit substitution of executors where the action was a nullity. The court rejected the Plaintiffs' argument that striking out would invite chaos.

p. 7
04

Consolidation

Holding

The suit was consolidated with Mombasa ELC No. 211 of 2014, which concerned the same parcels of land

Reasoning

Both cases concern the very same parcels of land; consolidation with the earlier-filed suit was ordered to ready the matter for trial and avoid duplicative litigation.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A representative suit may be commenced without prior leave but may not proceed without leave of the court, and notice must be given to all persons represented
  • Proceedings brought against a deceased person are a nullity in law

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiffs' application dated 3rd May 2016 is dismissed
  2. 2.The Plaintiffs are granted 30 days to comply with the requirements of Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  3. 3.The suit is consolidated with Mombasa ELC No. 211 of 2014; Amina Mohamed Khator & 6 Others v Ali Muhala & 3 Others
  4. 4.The names of and causes of action against the 8th and 9th Defendants are struck out as they were deceased prior to commencement of the suit
  5. 5.Parties to appear before the Deputy Registrar of the High Court within 45 days for pre-trial directions
  6. 6.The costs of the two applications shall be borne by the Plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 8
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 57

Cases cited (5)

  • Nguruman Ltd v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Giela v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
    (1973) EA 358
  • Mrao Ltd v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 Others
    (2003) KLR 125
  • Dawson (Bradford) Ltd and Others v Dove and Another
    (1971) 1 QB 330
  • Amina Mohamed Khator & 6 Others v Ali Muhala & 3 Others
    Mombasa ELC No. 211 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Al Mhala Swaleh & 4 others v Mohmamed M. Sheikh Ali & 12 others [2017] KEELC 1695 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). ELC 108 of 2016 (O.S). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/1695/eng@2017-09-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.