Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2017] KEELC 1473 (KLR)

Gideon Mwangi Chege v Christopher Nderitu Chege & another [2017] KEELC 1473 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
4 October 2017
1,361 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A landowner lost his appeal because he filed it late without court permission, even though his arguments may have been strong.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Nyeri against the award of the Central Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee made on 26th July 2000, which declared LR No. Nyeri/Watuka 979 and its subdivisions to be family land and allocated it among five family members, including the appellant who received 7.5 acres. The appellant, aggrieved, sought leave to file an appeal out of time by a Notice of Motion dated 14th August 2000. That application was dismissed by Ombwayo J on 11th December 2014, the judge finding that no appeal had actually been filed on record. Despite the refusal of leave, the appellant filed the instant appeal on 20th April 2015 without leave, challenging the Committee's award on grounds of denial of the right to call and cross-examine witnesses, failure to call the Settlement Fund Trustee Officer, erroneous findings on trust, and lack of jurisdiction over title to land. In written submissions, the appellant contended the Land Dispute Tribunals lacked jurisdiction over ownership of land and asked that the award be set aside. The respondents sought dismissal or striking out of the appeal for being filed out of time without leave, inordinate delay of over 15 years, and non-compliance with the award and costs orders. Waithaka J held that the appellant was obliged to file within 60 days of the award, that his plea for leave out of time had been refused by a court of concurrent jurisdiction and was neither appealed nor set aside, and that although the appeal raised germane issues, it was bad in law. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an appeal filed without leave after leave to file out of time was refused is competent

Holding

The appeal was bad in law as it was filed out of time without leave, and the refusal of leave by a court of concurrent jurisdiction had not been appealed from or set aside

Reasoning

The appellant was required to file his appeal within 60 days of the Appeals Committee's award. He failed to do so, and his application for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed by Ombwayo J on 11th December 2014, the court finding that no appeal had in fact been filed. Despite that refusal, the appellant filed the instant appeal on 20th April 2015 without obtaining review or leave. The court held that while the appeal raised germane issues, it was procedurally fatally defective and had to be dismissed.

p. 3
02

Whether the Land Disputes Tribunals had jurisdiction over claims on ownership of land

Holding

The appellant argued the Tribunals lacked jurisdiction over ownership of land, but the court did not determine this on the merits due to the procedural bar

Reasoning

The appellant submitted that the Land Dispute Tribunals established under the Land Disputes Tribunals Act (now repealed) had no jurisdiction to entertain ownership claims, terming the award null and void. The court acknowledged the appeal raised issues 'germane' and 'premised on sound legal principles' but declined to engage because the appeal itself was procedurally defective, having been filed out of time without leave.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal filed out of time without leave of the court is bad in law and cannot be entertained where a prior refusal of leave remains in force

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActNo. 18 of 1990 (now repealed)
On appeal from
Central Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee
Jurisdiction invoked
Appeal from the Central Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee under the Land Disputes Tribunals Act, No. 18 of 1990

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gideon Mwangi Chege v Christopher Nderitu Chege & another [2017] KEELC 1473 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/1473/eng@2017-10-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.