Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOther· [2017] KEELC 1375 (KLR)

Fredrick E. Mbaka Mbani v Alice Ciabui Mbuba & another [2017] KEELC 1375 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya at Chuka
24 October 2017
718 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court at Chuka threw out an appeal because the Embu Provincial Appeals Committee never made a decision to appeal against, so no appeal could exist.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This brief judgment of the High Court at Chuka (P. M. Njoroge, J) dealt with a matter filed before the court ostensibly as an appeal from the Embu Provincial Appeals Committee under the defunct Land Disputes Tribunals Act. On perusing the pleadings, the court found that the Committee never finalised the case and therefore never rendered a decision. Section 8 of the Act permits an appeal to the High Court only against a decision of an Appeals Committee, on a point of law and only upon certification by a Judge. Since no decision existed, no appeal could properly be filed, and the court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction. In support, the court invoked the classic dictum in The MV SS Lilian S that jurisdiction is everything and a court must down tools the moment it perceives it lacks jurisdiction; the Supreme Court's holding in Samuel Kamau & Another v Kenya Commercial Bank that jurisdiction flows only from the Constitution or written law; and the Supreme Court's restatement of that position in Petition No. 5 of 2015 (Republic v Karisa Chengo), quoting Lord Denning in Mcfoy v United Africa Co Ltd that an act which is void is a nullity and every proceeding founded on it is incurably bad. Holding that entertaining the matter would be 'putting something on nothing', the court found there was no appeal properly before it, directed that the file be removed from the list of pending appeals, and declared the matter disposed of. No order as to costs appears in the judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an appeal under the Land Disputes Tribunals Act lies where the Appeals Committee made no decision

Holding

No appeal lies; the Act permits appeals only against decisions of Appeals Committees, and none was made

Reasoning

Section 8 of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act allows an appeal to the High Court only from a decision of an Appeals Committee, certified as raising a point of law. Since the Embu Provincial Appeals Committee never finalised the case, there is no decision capable of being appealed, and the purported appeal was improperly filed. The court therefore lacks jurisdiction and must down tools.

p. 1
02

The court's obligation when it becomes aware it lacks jurisdiction

Holding

The court must decide the jurisdictional question immediately and cannot continue the proceedings

Reasoning

Relying on The MV SS Lilian S, the Supreme Court in Samuel Kamau & Another v Kenya Commercial Bank, and Lord Denning's dictum in Mcfoy v United Africa Co Ltd, the court held that jurisdiction goes to the heart of a matter; where it is absent, proceedings are a nullity and the court must stop at once rather than await further evidence.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction must be addressed the moment it arises, and a court without jurisdiction must halt proceedings immediately
  • A court's jurisdiction derives only from the Constitution or written law and cannot be self-conferred
  • Proceedings founded on a void act are a nullity

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Finding that there is no appeal properly before the court for want of jurisdiction
  2. 2.That the file be removed from the list of appeals pending in the court
  3. 3.Declaration that the matter has been disposed of by the court

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSection 8(8)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSection 8(9)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals ActSection 8(10)

Cases cited (3)

  • Samuel Kamau & Another versus Kenya Commercial Bank and Two Others
    Sup. Ct. Civil Application No. 2 of 2011
  • Republic versus Karisa Chengo and two others
    Petition No. 5 of 2015
  • Benjamin Leonard Mcfoy United African Company Limited
    [1962] AC 152
On appeal from
Embu Provincial Appeals Committee
Not stated in the judgment
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 8(9) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act (appeal to the High Court on a point of law from a decision of the Appeals Committee)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Fredrick E. Mbaka Mbani v Alice Ciabui Mbuba & another [2017] KEELC 1375 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/1375/eng@2017-10-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.