Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC Case of 2016 (application dated 5 September 2016)· [2017] KEELC 1101 (KLR)

Mary Wambui Njoroge ( suing as a legal representative of the estate of the late Simon Muraya Wacira) & another v Teresiah Njoki Kimiri [2017] KEELC 1101 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
31 October 2017
842 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court froze land transferred after the owner's death because no succession case had been filed, blocking any sale or dealing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an interlocutory application dated 5 September 2016, filed with the plaint, seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant from entering or dealing with three land parcels: Kiambogo/Kiambogo Block 2/16017 and 22071 (Mwariki) and Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 5/1015 (Kiungururia). The plaintiffs, the first wife and daughter of the late Simon Muraya Wacira (who died on 23 January 2016) as legal representatives of his estate, alleged that the defendant, the deceased's second wife, transferred the properties to herself on 15 February 2016 and 3 March 2016 without filing any succession cause, contrary to the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160. In the suit they sought declarations that the transfers were forged and null and void, reversion of titles to the deceased's name, and a permanent injunction. The defendant, though served, filed no response; an adjournment sought by her counsel at the inter partes hearing on 10 October 2017 was declined. Applying the Giella v Cassman Brown principles, the court found from the Green Cards that the deceased remained registered proprietor until after his death, that the estate was undistributed, and that no succession cause was shown to have been filed, establishing a prima facie case and potential irreparable loss. The court issued an injunction barring the defendant from any sale, charge, lease or other dealings, an order of inhibition over the register of the three parcels until determination of the suit, directed that the minor I S W (registered owner of the Kiungururia parcel) be joined through a guardian ad litem, ordered maintenance of the status quo on possession as at the deceased's death, and awarded the applicants the costs of the application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a prima facie case was established warranting preservation of the suit properties

Holding

Yes. The Green Cards showed the deceased remained registered proprietor until after his death, the estate was undistributed, and there was no proof of any succession cause; the transfers were prima facie irregular.

Reasoning

The plaintiffs annexed Green Cards showing the deceased was registered owner of the Mwariki parcels until 15 February 2016 and the Kiungururia parcel until 7 March 2016, both dates after his death on 23 January 2016. The estate had not been distributed and there was no evidence of a succession cause, so the transfers to the defendant were prima facie irregular and preservation was warranted.

p. 2
02

Whether irreparable loss would be suffered absent an injunction

Holding

Yes. Without an injunction, dealings on the properties could occur that would cause the plaintiffs irreparable loss.

Reasoning

The court reasoned that pending determination of ownership, the defendant or others might enter into dealings over the properties, and any such dealings would cause the plaintiffs irreparable loss that preservation orders would prevent. The injunction was therefore fortified with an inhibition against registration of any dealings.

p. 2
03

Irregularity of inter vivos or post-death transfers without succession proceedings under the Law of Succession Act

Holding

The court found prima facie that the transfers to the defendant after the proprietor's death were done without a succession cause, in disregard of the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160.

Reasoning

The deceased died on 23 January 2016 but the properties were transferred to the defendant on 15 February 2016 and 3 March 2016, and to a minor on 7 March 2016. No succession cause had been filed and the estate had not been distributed, rendering the transfers prima facie irregular and justifying interim preservation.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • The principles for granting an interlocutory injunction are a prima facie case with a probability of success, irreparable loss which cannot be compensated by damages, and, if in doubt, the balance of convenience.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Order of injunction barring the defendant from entering into any sale, charge, lease or any other dealings in respect of the suit properties
  2. 2.Order of inhibition restricting registration of any dealings in the register of the suit parcels Kiambogo/Kiambogo Block 2/16017 and 22071 (Mwariki) and Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 5/1015 (Kiungururia) until the suit is heard and determined or until further orders
  3. 3.Direction that I S W (minor) be enjoined to the suit through an appropriate guardian ad litem
  4. 4.Order that the status quo prevailing before the passing on of the deceased be maintained regarding possession until the suit is finalized
  5. 5.Costs of the application awarded to the applicants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActCap 160

Cases cited (1)

  • Giella vs Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over land parcels; interlocutory application under the Civil Procedure Rules, with the Law of Succession Act, Cap 160 invoked

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mary Wambui Njoroge ( suing as a legal representative of the estate of the late Simon Muraya Wacira) & another v Teresiah Njoki Kimiri [2017] KEELC 1101 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). ELC Case of 2016 (application dated 5 September 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/1101/eng@2017-10-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.