Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment· [2017] KEELC 794 (KLR)

Presbyterian Foundation v Douglas Kihiko Waiyaki & 4 others [2017] KEELC 794 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
10 November 2017
2,509 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A church foundation failed to win an injunction over school land in Nairobi because it could not prove it truly owned the property.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, a company limited by guarantee describing itself as legal custodian of PCEA properties, sued over the ownership of Title No. Dagoretti/Kinoo/539. It claimed it purchased Plot No. 512 from the County Council of Kiambu, subdivided it, and registered the suit property in its name as trustee of Kinoo Girls High School, where PCEA Kinoo Girls High School operated from 2007. It alleged that in October 2013 the 4th defendant, colluding with the 1st to 3rd defendants, fraudulently cancelled that registration and substituted the plaintiff as trustee of Mama Ngina Primary School. Together with its plaint dated 24th February 2016, it sought a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from occupying, alienating or interfering with the suit property. The defendants responded that the property was at all material times held by the plaintiff as trustee of Mama Ngina Primary School, a public school; that the plaintiff had fraudulently procured registration as trustee of a private school, and that the Land Registrar had lawfully rectified the register under section 79(2) of the Land Registration Act, 2012 after the plaintiff's officials refused to show cause. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the court held the plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case with a probability of success, having offered no explanation of how trust property of a public school transferred to a private school. Irreparable harm was also not shown, as the property remained registered in the plaintiff's name as trustee of Mama Ngina Primary School. The application was dismissed with costs to the defendants.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case with a probability of success

Holding

No - the plaintiff failed to prove ownership of the suit property; uncontroverted evidence showed the property was held in trust for Mama Ngina Primary School, a public school

Reasoning

The court found the defendants' documentary evidence - extracts of registers and official searches - uncontroverted. That evidence traced the suit property to Plot No. 512, acquired by Kiambu County Council for Mama Ngina Primary School, and transferred to the plaintiff as trustee. The plaintiff offered no explanation of how property held in trust for a public school came to be registered as trustee of a private school, which the court characterized as a fraudulent acquisition.

p. 4
02

Whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm not adequately compensable by damages

Holding

No - there was no evidence of interference with school activities nor of any threat of disposal, since the property remained registered in the plaintiff's name as trustee of Mama Ngina Primary School

Reasoning

The court observed that there was no evidence the defendants were interfering with learning activities on the suit property, and no threat of disposal existed because the register still showed the plaintiff as trustee of Mama Ngina Primary School following the Registrar's rectification under section 79(2) of the Land Registration Act, 2012. Damages would therefore suffice, and the balance of convenience did not need to be considered.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for a temporary injunction must show a prima facie case with a probability of success and irreparable injury not adequately compensable by damages; if in doubt, the court decides on a balance of convenience
  • Uncontroverted averments and documentary evidence placed before the court by an opponent may defeat an injunction application even at the interlocutory stage

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 24th February, 2016 is dismissed with costs to the defendants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Actsection 79(2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Giella vs. Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd
    (1973) EA 358
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over disputes concerning ownership of land (suit property Title No. Dagoretti/Kinoo/539)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Presbyterian Foundation v Douglas Kihiko Waiyaki & 4 others [2017] KEELC 794 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2017). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2017/794/eng@2017-11-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.