Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedLand Case No. 125 of 2014· [2016] KEELC 1169 (KLR)

David Sikuku Kones v Bashir Trowet Chemaswet & another [2016] KEELC 1169 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
18 January 2016
704 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court refused to jail a man for demolishing a rival's structure because the injunction was suspended when he did it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, David Sikuku Kones, brought a notice of motion dated 4.6.2015 seeking the committal of the 2nd defendant, Bashir Trowet Chemaswet, to civil jail for up to six months for contempt of orders issued on 21.1.2015. The plaintiff alleged that between 27.5.2015 and 2.6.2015 the respondent demolished a house he had built on the disputed property, sprayed growing maize with herbicides and carried away iron sheets, in breach of injunctive orders restraining interference with the suit property. The respondent opposed the application, denying breach and asserting that the orders of 21.1.2015 had been stayed on 22.4.2015, when interim orders staying them and maintaining the status quo prevailing before the suit were granted pending hearing of his application to set aside the injunction on grounds of non-service. Justice E. Obaga framed a single issue: whether the respondent was in contempt of the order of 21.1.2015. The court found that the stay was operative at the time of the alleged acts and only lapsed when the setting-aside application was dismissed on 14.7.2015. Although the respondent's conduct may have been criminal, he breached no court order then in force. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondent on 18 January 2016.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the respondent was in contempt of the order of 21.1.2015

Holding

No contempt was established because the order of 21.1.2015 had been stayed by the interim orders of 22.4.2015 and was only revived upon dismissal of the setting-aside application on 14.7.2015, after the alleged acts of demolition

Reasoning

The court traced the sequence of orders: the injunction of 21.1.2015 was stayed on 22.4.2015 with a status quo order, and the stay operated until the setting-aside application was dismissed on 14.7.2015. The demolition and spraying occurred between 27.5.2015 and 2.6.2015, when no operative order existed. The respondent's actions may have been criminal but were not a breach of a court order.

p. 2
02

Whether self-help destruction of the applicant's property attracts contempt sanctions in the absence of an operative order

Holding

Self-help may be criminal but does not constitute contempt where no court order was in force

Reasoning

The court acknowledged that the respondent took the law into his own hands by destroying the applicant's structure and carrying away iron sheets. However, since the orders of 21.1.2015 had been stayed, the conduct, though possibly criminal, could not found a committal to civil jail for contempt.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party cannot be punished for contempt of an order that has been stayed; contempt lies only for breach of an order actually in force at the time of the alleged breach

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant's notice of motion dated 4.6.2015 seeking committal of the 2nd respondent to civil jail is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondent
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent contempt/civil jail jurisdiction of the High Court-equivalent Environment and Land Court under orders made in Land Case No. 125 of 2014 (no specific statutory provision cited in the ruling)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "David Sikuku Kones v Bashir Trowet Chemaswet & another [2016] KEELC 1169 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Land Case No. 125 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2016/1169/eng@2016-01-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.