Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of motion dated 5th February, 2016 (suit relating to unsurveyed Residential Plot No. A5 No.60-Nanyuki Municipality)· [2016] KEELC 412 (KLR)

Zakaria Macharia Kagunya & 2 others v County Govt of Laikipia & 2 others [2016] KEELC 412 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 October 2016
3,148 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court dismissed a mosque construction dispute because the plaintiffs had to first use statutory complaint channels before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiffs moved the court by notice of motion dated 5th February 2016 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from continuing construction of a mosque on unsurveyed Residential Plot No. A5 No.60-Nanyuki Municipality and a mandatory injunction compelling its removal or demolition. The plaintiffs' complaint was that the development was effected without change of user, environmental impact assessment and other approvals required under the Physical Planning Act, the Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act, the Cities Act and the County Government Act. The defendants opposed the application through grounds of opposition and a replying affidavit, contending that the plaintiffs lacked locus standi, that the mosque had operated since 2006 and was complete, that steps towards compliance had been taken, and that the applicants would suffer no prejudice. The 1st defendant's counsel conceded that the 2nd and 3rd defendants had not adhered to certain procedures. The court framed four issues, chief among them whether it had jurisdiction to hear the matter as a court of first instance. Relying on Mutanga Tea & Coffee Company Limited v. Shikara Limited and other authorities, the court held that the Physical Planning Act and EMCA establish internal dispute-resolution mechanisms - liaison committees and the National Environmental Tribunal - and that the High Court is seized of such disputes only on appeal, not originally. Finding itself without jurisdiction, the court declined to consider the remaining issues and dismissed the application and the entire suit with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court to entertain disputes arising from development approvals under the Physical Planning Act and EMCA as a court of first instance

Holding

The court lacks original jurisdiction; the statutes establish liaison committees and the National Environmental Tribunal as the first fora, with the High Court seized only on appeal.

Reasoning

The Physical Planning Act provides for appeals from the Liaison Committee to the National Liaison Committee before the High Court, and EMCA channels grievances to the National Environmental Tribunal under section 125 with appeals to the High Court under section 130. Relying on Mutanga Tea and related authorities, the court held that where a clear statutory procedure exists it must be strictly followed, and that the High Court's unlimited original jurisdiction is subject to Article 162(2)(b).

p. 4
02

Whether the applicants have capacity and have made out a case for interlocutory injunctions

Holding

Not determined, as the jurisdictional finding disposed of the application and suit.

Reasoning

Having found that it lacked jurisdiction as a court of first instance, the court declined to consider the remaining issues of capacity, prejudice and the threshold for a mandatory injunction, holding that it need not belabour itself with them.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a statute establishes bodies and procedures for resolving disputes arising from a statutory mandate, the High Court's jurisdiction under those statutes is appellate and not original; a party must first exhaust the statutory mechanism
  • A court without jurisdiction must down tools immediately

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application and the suit are dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application and suit awarded to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 165; Article 165(3)(a); Article 162(2)(b)
  • Physical Planning Act (Cap 386)Sections 10, 13, 15(1) and (4), 29, 33(3), 38(5)
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSections 32, 125, 130
  • Urban and Cities ActSection 22
  • County Government Act
  • Law Reform ActSection 9
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53

Cases cited (12)

  • Lolldaiga Hills Limited & 2 others v. Robert James Wells & 3 others
    Nairobi HCCC No.345 of 2011
  • Mohamed Ahmed Noor & 3 Others v. Bora Developers Limited & 2 others
    (2012) eKLR
  • Machamuka Farmers Co. Limited v. Soima Lekenge Ntaiya & Others
    Nyeri HCCC No.152 of 2011
  • International Centre for Policy and Conflict & 5 others v. The Attorney General & 4 others
  • Mutanga Tea & Coffee Company Limited v. Shikara Limited & Another
    (2012) eKLR
  • Speaker of the National Assembly versus Karume
    [1992] KLR 22
  • R versus Birmingham City Council exparte Ferrero Ltd
    [1993] All ER 530
  • R versus National Environmental Management Authority exparte Sound Equipment Ltd
    [2010] eKLR
  • Peter Njeru Mugo v. Nairobi City Council
    (2015) eKLR
  • Republic v. County Government of Kiambu ex parte Fechim Investments Limited
    (2016) eKLR
  • Raymond Cheruiyot & others v. Erick Kibaara Nderitu & 3 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel "Lilian S" v. Caltex Oil (K) Limited
    [1989] KLR 1
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya (as limited by the Physical Planning Act and EMCA statutory dispute-resolution mechanisms)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Zakaria Macharia Kagunya & 2 others v County Govt of Laikipia & 2 others [2016] KEELC 412 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Notice of motion dated 5th February, 2016 (suit relating to unsurveyed Residential Plot No. A5 No.60-Nanyuki Municipality). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2016/412/eng@2016-10-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.