Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNot stated in the judgment (plaint filed 29 July 2016)· [2016] KEELC 349 (KLR)

Jared Omwoyo Nyakwara v Alice Kingori [2016] KEELC 349 (KLR)

Environment & Land Court
18 October 2016
1,137 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court refused to decide who owns a disputed Nakuru plot early on, instead appointing agents to rent it out and preserve it until trial.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, registered as proprietor of Nakuru Municipality Block 15/103 on 23 August 2013 after purchasing it from John Warui Mathenge for Kshs. 8,500,000/=, sued the defendant for disturbing his enjoyment of the land and sought a permanent injunction, costs and interest. Together with the plaint he sought an interim injunction under Order 40 Rules 1, 2 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The defendant contended that the property belonged to her late father, James Wanjohi Kingori, who died on 19 June 2013, that she and her sisters were raised there, and that the transfer to Mathenge and then the plaintiff occurred under suspicious circumstances, pointing to a Land Registrar's restriction suspecting fraud. A preliminary objection that the defendant lacked letters of administration was resolved when she obtained a grant ad litem on 19 August 2016. After a site visit revealing an unoccupied, dilapidated bungalow, the court declined to make findings on the validity of the plaintiff's title, reserving that for trial. Instead of granting the injunction sought, the court appointed Metrocosmo Limited as managing agents to let the premises, allowed requisite repairs deductible from rent, directed monthly deposits of net rent into court with six-monthly accounts, and issued an order of inhibition against any dealings in the register. Costs of the application were made costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of the plaintiff's title versus the defendant's allegation of fraud

Holding

No determinate finding was made; the question of whether the plaintiff's title is good or bad was left for trial

Reasoning

The register showed the property registered to the deceased, then to John Warui Mathenge on 12 May 2004, and then to the plaintiff on 23 August 2013. The defendant alleged suspicious circumstances and pointed to a Land Registrar's restriction suspecting fraud. The court held it would be unwise to decide title at the interlocutory stage and reserved that question for the trial.

p. 2
02

Preservation of the suit property pending trial

Holding

The property was to be let out through Metrocosmo Limited as managing agents, with rent deposited in court, and an inhibition registered against dealings

Reasoning

The site visit revealed the bungalow was unoccupied and dilapidated despite the plaintiff's claim of residence. The court reasoned that letting the property to a paying tenant, barring dealings, and depositing rents in court best preserved the subject matter without prejudice to either party pending final determination.

p. 2
03

Preliminary objection that the defendant lacked letters of administration

Holding

The objection was overtaken by the defendant obtaining a grant of letters of administration ad litem issued on 19 August 2016

Reasoning

Counsel for the defendant tendered a copy of the grant ad litem in the course of submissions. The court accepted that this cured the objection that the suit was misconceived for want of representation of the estate of the late Kingori, and proceeded to determine the injunction application on its merits.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • At the interlocutory stage an injunction application is directed at preservation of the suit property rather than a final determination of title

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Metrocosmo Limited appointed as managing agents of the suit property pending conclusion of the case, with effect immediately
  2. 2.The managing agents to shop for a tenant and rent out the premises
  3. 3.The agents may undertake requisite repairs, deductible from the rent
  4. 4.Rent collected, after deduction of management fees and reasonable maintenance expenses, to be deposited in court monthly, with an account given every 6 months until the case is concluded
  5. 5.An order of inhibition issued, inhibiting registration of any dealings in the register of the suit property
  6. 6.Costs of the application to be costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rules 1, 2 and 4
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 40 Rules 1, 2 and 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules (application for injunction); Environment and Land Court original jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jared Omwoyo Nyakwara v Alice Kingori [2016] KEELC 349 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Not stated in the judgment (plaint filed 29 July 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2016/349/eng@2016-10-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.