Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2014 in HCCC suit concerning LR No. 13459/4/(I.R. No. 53362))· [2016] KEELC 141 (KLR)

John Wallace Mathare & another v Joyce Wanja Gitau & 6 others [2016] KEELC 141 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
4 November 2016
1,426 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the High Court at Nairobi (Okong'o J) on a Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2014 by the Plaintiffs seeking release of the title deeds for LR No. 13459/44 to 13459/48, which had been deposited in court pursuant to conditional stay-of-execution orders made by Angawa J on 22nd September 1999 and later by the Court of Appeal. The underlying suit, filed on 1st July 1995, sought a declaration that a 1995 sale agreement and transfer were fraudulently entered into to defeat the Plaintiffs' interest, and specific performance of an agreement dated 18th September 1990. Angawa J's judgment of 16th August 1999 granted the Plaintiffs specific performance, cancelled the title issued to the 7th Defendant on grounds of fraud, and ordered transfer of the Plaintiffs' portion. The Defendants' appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 26th April 2013 with costs, subject only to the Plaintiffs paying Kshs.201,650/= to the 1st Defendant's estate, which the Plaintiffs paid. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was refused by the Court of Appeal (8th November 2013) and the Supreme Court dismissed a review of that refusal (16th October 2015). The Defendants' advocates were duly served but did not attend the hearing on 9th May 2016, and the court proceeded unopposed. Finding every material fact undisputed, the court held that the determination of the appeal paved the way for execution and allowed the motion in terms of prayer 2, with costs to the Plaintiffs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Release of title deeds deposited in court as security/condition for stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

The application was allowed; the titles deposited pursuant to Angawa J's orders are to be released to the Plaintiffs to enable execution of the undisturbed 1999 judgment.

Reasoning

The court found it undisputed that judgment was entered for the Plaintiffs by Angawa J, that the Defendants' appeal was dismissed with costs, that the Plaintiffs paid the Kshs.201,650/= ordered by the Court of Appeal, and that applications for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court were refused both in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. The purpose of the deposit lapsed with the determination of the appeal, so release aids execution.

p. 3
02

Status of the judgment of Angawa J after the appellate history

Holding

The judgment of 16th August 1999 remains undisturbed and binding on the Defendants, entitling the Plaintiffs to specific performance and cancellation of the 7th Defendant's title.

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal dismissed the Defendants' appeal on 26th April 2013 with costs, leaving only an order that the Plaintiffs pay Kshs.201,650/= to the 1st Defendant's estate. Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was denied on 8th November 2013 and the Supreme Court dismissed a review of that decision on 16th October 2015, so the 1999 judgment stands.

p. 2
03

Proceeding in the absence of the Defendants' advocates

Holding

The court, having satisfied itself that the Defendants' advocates were duly served with a hearing notice, allowed the Plaintiffs' counsel to proceed.

Reasoning

On 9th May 2016 the Defendants' advocates did not appear despite being duly served. The court exercised its discretion to hear the application ex parte on the strength of proof of service, heard Mr. Nyaribo for the Plaintiffs, and determined the application on the undisputed documentary history.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Where title deeds were deposited in court pending the hearing and determination of an appeal, and that appeal has been determined, the prevailing party is entitled to their release to aid execution of the judgment.
  • Cancellation of a fraudulently obtained title and issuance of a new title requires surrender of the earlier titles to the Land Registrar for cancellation.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 18th March 2014 is allowed in terms of prayer 2 thereof (release of the title deeds for LR No. 13459/44, 13459/45, 13459/46, 13459/47 and 13459/48 deposited in court to the Plaintiffs)
  2. 2.The Plaintiffs shall have the costs of the application

Authorities

#

Cases cited (2)

  • Charles Kiraithe Kiarie and 2 others Vs. The Administrator of the estate of John Wallace Mathare (deceased) and 5 others, Court of Appeal at Nairobi, Civil Appeal No. 225 of 2006
  • Charles Karathe Kiarie & 2 Others vs. John Wallace Mathare & another, Court of Appeal Civil Application No. Nai.294 of 1999
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the High Court over the suit; the application is a Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2014 for release of title deeds deposited in court pursuant to orders of Angawa J dated 22nd September 1999

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Wallace Mathare & another v Joyce Wanja Gitau & 6 others [2016] KEELC 141 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 19th March 2014 in HCCC suit concerning LR No. 13459/4/(I.R. No. 53362)). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2016/141/eng@2016-11-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.