Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKisumu HCCC No.245 of 1998 (registered as Kisumu CMCC No.232 of 2003)· [2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)

Dominc Nyamema Gor v Michael Ombara Ajuoga & another [2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 December 2016
741 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The court refused to return a land case to the High Court because it was already awaiting judgment in the lower court and no valid reason was shown.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, Domic Nyamema Gor, filed a notice of motion dated 16th July 2014 seeking the return of Kisumu HCCC No.245 of 1998 - transferred to the Chief Magistrates' Court where it was registered as Kisumu CMCC No.232 of 2003 - to the High Court for hearing. He deponed that no party had moved the High Court to transfer the case. The Respondents, Michael Obara Ajuonga and David Otieno Amoi, opposed through grounds of opposition dated 22nd July 2014. The court framed two issues: whether the Applicant had made a reasonable case for the transfer, and costs. The court found from the plaint and amended plaint that the Applicant was the Plaintiff and the Respondents the Defendants, and observed it was confusing for the Applicant to depone that he came across the amended plaint on perusing the file when it was his own suit paper. The court found the suit was properly registered in the lower court after transfer, both parties had already testified with only judgment pending, and no grounds justified transferring a suit awaiting judgment. Further, the transfer order was made by a court of concurrent jurisdiction; the motion was not for review or setting aside the transfer order, and it was too late in any event - the proper remedy for a party aggrieved was an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The notice of motion was dismissed with costs. Delivered by S.M. Kibunja, Environment & Land Judge, on 14th December 2016.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicant made a reasonable case for transfer of the suit from the lower court to the High Court

Holding

The application was dismissed because the suit was pending judgment and no grounds justified the transfer; the transfer had been ordered by a court of concurrent jurisdiction and the proper remedy was an appeal.

Reasoning

Both parties had already testified before the lower court, with only judgment remaining. The transfer of Kisumu HCCC No.245 of 1998 to the lower court was ordered by a court of concurrent jurisdiction. The notice of motion was neither for review nor setting aside of the transfer order, and in any event it was too late for such an application. An aggrieved party's forum was the Court of Appeal.

p. 2
02

Costs

Holding

Costs were awarded to the Respondents as the application was dismissed with costs.

Reasoning

Following the dismissal of the notice of motion as without merit, the normal rule of costs following the event applied, and the Applicant was ordered to pay the Respondents' costs of the application.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A court of concurrent jurisdiction's transfer order cannot be disturbed; the remedy for a party aggrieved by such a transfer order lies in appeal, not in an application before the same court.
  • A court will not order the transfer of a civil suit pending judgment in a lower court absent grounds justifying the transfer.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant's notice of motion dated 16th July 2014 seeking to transfer Kisumu CMCC No.232 of 2003 to the High Court was dismissed with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the High Court/ELC over suits transferred to subordinate courts (order for transfer of a suit for hearing)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Dominc Nyamema Gor v Michael Ombara Ajuoga & another [2016] KEELC 52 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2016). Kisumu HCCC No.245 of 1998 (registered as Kisumu CMCC No.232 of 2003). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2016/52/eng@2016-12-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.