Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissed· [2015] KEELC 111 (KLR)

Angwenyi Samuel Aunga & 2 others v I & M Bank [2015] KEELC 111 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
31 July 2015
2,874 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court allowed a bank to proceed with auctioning a borrower's land because statutory notices sent to the borrower's old address counted as valid service.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs, who had obtained ex-parte interim injunction orders on 17th February 2015 restraining the Defendant bank from auctioning Ngong/Ngong/33337, applied to confirm the injunction pending determination of the suit. They argued that statutory notices of sale were never received because their post office box was closed in December 2013, that the Notification of Sale was not properly served by the auctioneer, that interest was illegally computed contrary to the Central Bank of Kenya Act and Banking Act, and that the property was undervalued at Kshs 20 Million against a market value of Kshs 32.5 Million. The Defendant countered that credit facilities of Kshs 18 Million were granted in April 2013 and defaulted upon; that the Statutory Notice of Sale under Sections 90(1) of the Land Act and 56(2) of the Land Registration Act, the 40 Days Notice under Section 96(3)(h), and the 45-day Notification of Sale were all issued and served by registered post and personal service, evidenced by Certificates of Postage and the auctioneer's affidavit; and that its valuation by Daytons Valuers placed market value at Kshs 22 Million. The court held that service by registered mail to the last known address is valid and the borrower must notify the lender of any address change; that service under Rule 15 of the Auctioneer's Rules was properly effected; that the interest ground was abandoned; and that a parallel valuation report alone cannot prove undervaluation. The Plaintiffs' application was dismissed and the Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 16th March 2015 allowed in terms of prayers 2, 3 and 5, with costs to the Defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of service of statutory notices of sale

Holding

The statutory notices were validly served by registered post to the Plaintiffs' last known postal address; the closure of the post office box was not communicated to the Defendant

Reasoning

The notices under Sections 90(1) and 96(3)(h) of the Land Act and 56(2) of the Land Registration Act were sent by registered post to the address in the Letter of Offer, with Certificates of Postage. The Plaintiffs knew their box was closed but gave no evidence they informed the Defendant. Service through the last known address is the general rule, and notifying any change is the borrower's duty.

p. 3
02

Compliance with Rule 15 of the Auctioneer's Rules on service of the Notification of Sale

Holding

Service was properly effected by personal service on the 2nd Plaintiff, an adult member of the registered proprietor, and by registered post, with the auctioneer swearing an affidavit detailing service

Reasoning

Rule 15 requires the auctioneer to prepare a Notification of Sale indicating the value of the property and to serve it on the registered owner or an adult family member, giving a 45-day redemption notice. The Notification of Sale dated 4th September 2014 was in the prescribed form, and Joseph Mungai Gikonyo swore an affidavit detailing personal service at Our Lady of Mercy Secondary School, Shauri Moyo and service by registered post.

p. 4
03

Alleged illegal interest rates under Section 44A of the Banking Act

Holding

The ground was abandoned; no evidence or submissions were tendered to show contravention of Section 44A

Reasoning

Although the Plaintiffs pleaded that the Defendant was computing interest at high rates contrary to Section 39 of the Central Bank of Kenya Act, no evidence was tendered or submissions made on the issue. Section 44A of the Banking Act limits recoverable interest on defaulted loans, but the Plaintiffs made no attempt to demonstrate a contravention.

p. 4
04

Alleged undervaluation of the charged property contrary to Section 97 of the Land Act

Holding

The undervaluation ground failed; a parallel valuation report with higher figures is insufficient to prove undervaluation

Reasoning

Section 97(2) of the Land Act obliges a chargee to obtain a forced sale valuation before exercising the right of sale. Daytons Valuers placed market value at Kshs 22 Million; Tuliflocks placed it at Kshs 32.5 Million. Following Gikonyo J. in Olkasasi Limited v Equity Bank Limited, a conflicting valuation must be dislodged on real items, terms and legal parameters acceptable in the valuation profession, which the Plaintiffs did not do.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Service of a statutory notice by registered mail to the chargor's last known address is valid; the burden is on the borrower to notify the lender of any change of address
  • A party cannot establish undervaluation merely by producing a parallel valuation report with higher figures; the bank's valuation must be dislodged on real, professional parameters

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiffs' application dated 13th February 2015 seeking confirmation of the interim injunction is dismissed with costs to the Defendant
  2. 2.The Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 16th March 2015 is allowed in terms of prayer Nos. 2, 3 and 5 (discharge/setting aside of the interim injunction orders of 17th February 2015 and payment of auctioneer's costs)
  3. 3.Costs to the Defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Central Bank of Kenya ActSection 39
  • Banking ActSection 44A
  • Land ActSection 90(1)
  • Land ActSection 96(3) and Section 96(3)(h)
  • Land Act, 2012Section 97(2)
  • Land Registration ActSection 56(2)
  • Auctioneer's RulesRule 15

Cases cited (2)

  • Moses Kibiego Yator v Eco Bank Kenya Limited
    E&L Eldoret No. 426 of 2013 [2014] eKLR
  • Olkasasi Limited v Equity Bank Limited
    HCCC Nairobi No. 222 of 2014 [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Not expressly stated; original civil jurisdiction over land charge matters

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Angwenyi Samuel Aunga & 2 others v I & M Bank [2015] KEELC 111 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2015). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2015/111/eng@2015-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.