Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (HCC at Kisumu, Environment and Land Court)· [2014] KEELC 362 (KLR)

Lydia Achieng Abura v Usonik Farm Purchase Co-Operative Society Limited [2014] KEELC 362 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
8 May 2014
664 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled that its jurisdiction is national, so land suits cannot be moved to a different town just because the property lies elsewhere.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The defendant filed a preliminary objection dated 28/2/2014, premised on Section 19 of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2011 and Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act, contending that since the suit property, Land Reference 6015/3, is situated in Nandi District, the suit should be heard at Eldoret and not Kisumu; the ELC at Kisumu was thereby faulted for lacking territorial jurisdiction. The plaintiff opposed, asserting that the 1000-acre property straddles Kisumu and Nandi and is nearer Kisumu than Eldoret, and that the court's jurisdiction is national, not local, so Section 12 - which concerns the local limits of subordinate courts - does not apply. The plaintiff relied on the Machakos High Court decision in Daniel Kimani Moseka v Japheth Arthur Mwangi Kiure, where a similar objection was dismissed on the basis that the High Court's jurisdiction is national. The court adopted that reasoning, holding that the ELC is a superior court of record at par with the High Court with national jurisdiction, and that Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act applies only to subordinate courts. It further noted that the defendant's replying papers were silent on the plaintiff's assertions about the property's location, leaving them unchallenged, and that the defendant showed no inconvenience, ulterior motive, or prejudice from the suit being heard at Kisumu. The court dismissed the objection with costs to the plaintiff and granted a right of appeal of 14 days.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act governs the territorial jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court

Holding

It does not; Section 12 applies only to subordinate courts with local limits, whereas the ELC's jurisdiction is national.

Reasoning

The court reasoned that the ELC, being a superior court of record at par with the High Court, exercises national jurisdiction. Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act addresses the local limits of subordinate courts and therefore has no application to the ELC. The court adopted the reasoning in the Machakos case cited by the plaintiff, where a similar objection was dismissed on the same basis.

p. 1
02

Whether the location of the suit property in Nandi District, closer to Eldoret, warranted transfer of the suit

Holding

No; the defendant did not challenge the plaintiff's uncontroverted assertions that the property straddles Kisumu and Nandi and is nearer Kisumu, nor show any inconvenience or prejudice from hearing the suit at Kisumu.

Reasoning

The defendant's response was mute on the plaintiff's assertions that the 1000-acre property straddles two administrative areas and lies nearer Kisumu than Eldoret. Those points therefore stood unchallenged. The defendant also failed to demonstrate any inconvenience, disadvantage, ulterior motive, or undeserved advantage arising from the suit being heard at Kisumu. The objection consequently failed on both law and circumstances.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The Environment and Land Court is a superior court of record whose jurisdiction is national, not local, and Section 12 of the Civil Procedure Act on suits relating to immovable property does not apply to it.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection dated 28/2/2014 and filed on 4/3/2014 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the preliminary objection awarded to the plaintiff
  3. 3.Right of appeal granted as 14 days

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 19
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)Section 12

Cases cited (1)

  • DANIEL KIMANI MOSEKA VS JAPHETH ARTHUR MWANGI KIURIRE
    HCC NO.228/2011, MACHAKOS
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court Act, 2011 (Section 19) read with the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21); ELC as a superior court of record with national jurisdiction

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lydia Achieng Abura v Usonik Farm Purchase Co-Operative Society Limited [2014] KEELC 362 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2014). Not stated in judgment (HCC at Kisumu, Environment and Land Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2014/362/eng@2014-05-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.