Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal (Application) E514 of 2019

Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Ltd v Capture Solutions Ltd & 3 others

Court of Appeal
25 September 2026
4,062 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to stop execution of an arbitral award against Nairobi Water because the company never properly filed an appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Notice of Motion dated 26th November 2025, Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Limited sought stay of execution of an arbitral award of 27th December 2019 (recognised by Majanja, J on 27th August 2020) and of execution proceedings, and sought to cite the 3rd respondent for perjury and all respondents for contempt, alleging they reneged on an undertaking not to execute pending appeal. The intended appeal targets Majanja J's decision of 14th December 2020 declining leave to appeal out of time. The respondents opposed, arguing the application was res judicata, an abuse of process and incompetent, since the decree of 27th August 2020 is not under appeal and the applicant had filed five successive stay applications. The Court traced the litigation history: repeated failed attempts to obtain leave or extension of time, culminating in the full bench's dismissal of the reference on 31st July 2026 for res judicata and abuse of process. Holding that the notice of appeal confers jurisdiction and that stay is only available to a party who has procedurally intimated an appeal, the Court found the stay prayers stillborn. On contempt and perjury, no evidence of the alleged undertaking was produced and the high contempt threshold was not met, though the Court cautioned that collusion to escape a counsel's undertaking may attract contempt findings and sections 55 and 56 of the Advocates Act. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of execution can issue pending an appeal that has not been procedurally initiated

Holding

Stay prayers fail because the applicant never obtained leave to appeal and filed no notice of appeal; without procedural intimation of appeal the Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain stay.

Reasoning

The Court traced the litigation history: every attempt to obtain leave or extension of time to appeal the arbitral award or the recognition decision was dismissed, culminating in the full bench dismissal of 31st July 2026 for res judicata and abuse of process. Since the notice of appeal confers jurisdiction, an applicant whose attempts to lodge one have hit a snag cannot enjoy stay orders.

p. 6
02

Whether the respondents should be cited for contempt and perjury over an alleged undertaking not to execute

Holding

The contempt and perjury prayers fail; no evidence of the undertaking was placed before the Court and the high contempt threshold was not met.

Reasoning

The applicant asserted that stay applications were withdrawn on an undertaking by the 3rd respondent not to execute, but produced no evidence of it. Citing Republic v Mohammed & Another, the Court held it was not satisfied the respondents wilfully disobeyed any order. The Court noted, however, that collusion to escape a counsel's undertaking could attract contempt findings and sections 55 and 56 of the Advocates Act.

p. 6
03

Whether the doctrine of merger bars stay of the recognised arbitral award

Holding

The respondents' merger argument was not necessary to decide, as the application failed on the absence of appellate jurisdiction; the Court did not adopt the merger doctrine as its basis.

Reasoning

The respondents, citing Virgin Atlantic, argued that merger sets in once an arbitral award is recognised, so the only decree capable of being stayed is the High Court decree, which is not under appeal. The Court disposed of the application on the notice-of-appeal/jurisdiction ground without expressly ruling on merger.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • It is the notice of appeal that confers jurisdiction on the Court of Appeal; without leave to appeal or a notice of appeal, prayers for stay of execution pending appeal are stillborn.
  • A stay of execution is only granted where a party has procedurally intimated an intention to appeal.
  • Contempt of court carries a high threshold of proof; wilful disobedience must be demonstrated on the record.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 26th November 2025 is dismissed with costs to the respondents
On appeal from
High Court at Nairobi
Misc. Application No. 679 of 2020
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules (stay of execution pending appeal); Rule 4 (extension of time) referenced

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nairobi City Water & Sewerage Company Ltd v Capture Solutions Ltd & 3 others", Case Analysis (2026). Civil Appeal (Application) E514 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1691/eng@2026-09-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.