Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal (Application) E093 of 2023· [2026] KECA 1673 (KLR)

Ndegwa & another v Khaemba & 3 others

Court of Appeal
11 September 2026
2,115 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to let appellants fix a defective appeal record, finding the late, vague amendment application was made in bad faith.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (H.A. Omondi, JA) on a Notice of Motion dated 2nd June 2026 in which the appellants, Maina Ndegwa and Alice Njoki Maina, sought leave to amend their record of appeal filed on 15th May 2023, to replace faint and improperly marked documents with the correct documents filed before the Environment and Land Court, which had on 24th November 2022 (Komingoi, J.) entered judgment in favour of the 1st and 2nd respondents. The application was prompted by a pending motion by the 1st and 2nd respondents dated 12th January 2026 seeking to strike out the record of appeal and the appeal as fatally defective. The applicants attributed the defective filing to inadvertence by a former advocate, Elna Mudibo, who had left the firm, and urged that the mistake of counsel should not be visited on diligent litigants. The respondents opposed, contending the application was an abuse of process, reactionary to their strike-out application, not specifically pleaded, and unexplained by the three-year delay. The court applied Rule 46 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, and the amendment principles in Kanawal Sarjit Singh Dhim v Keshavji Jivraj Shah and Joseph Ochieng t/a Acquiline Agencies, holding that the discretion to amend must be exercised judiciously and on reason. Finding the application mischievous, made in bad faith, and not identifying the specific pages to be amended, the court dismissed it with costs to the respondents. The underlying appeal and the strike-out application remain pending.

Key legal issues

#
01

Exercise of discretion to amend under Rule 46

Holding

Although Rule 46 does not prescribe the considerations, the discretion must be exercised judiciously, guided by the principles in Joseph Ochieng & Others t/a Acquiline Agencies

Reasoning

The court noted Rule 46 is silent on what the court should consider, but held that discretionary power must be dictated by reason rather than exercised capriciously or arbitrarily, and adopted the amendment principles from the Acquiline Agencies case as a useful guide.

p. 4
02

Good faith and abuse of court process

Holding

The application was reactionary to the respondents' strike-out application, filed instead of responding to that application, and constituted an abuse of process made in bad faith

Reasoning

The applicants were served with the respondents' application to strike out the appeal but instead of responding, filed this amendment application. The court found this a back-door attempt to defeat the strike-out application, exposing the applicants' laxity or indolence.

p. 4
03

Specificity of the amendment sought

Holding

The application failed because it did not identify the specific illegible pages nor attach the pages sought to be amended

Reasoning

The court agreed with the respondents that a blanket application without identifying the specific pages would open the floodgates to introducing new pleadings, and that an application not specifically pleaded could not be allowed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Discretionary power, however wide, must be exercised judiciously and based on reason, not whim or caprice
  • An application for leave to amend must set out the amendment in writing and identify the specific pages or documents to be amended

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 2nd June 2026 seeking leave to amend the record of appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondents
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Case No. 576 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (Rule 46) - application for leave to amend the record of appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndegwa & another v Khaemba & 3 others", Case Analysis (2026). Civil Appeal (Application) E093 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1673/eng@2026-09-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.