Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNotice of Motion dated 13th February 2026 (Civil Application)· [2026] KECA 1524 (KLR)

Nixon Mwai Kimiti v British Army Training Unit Kenya

Court of Appeal of Kenya
31 July 2026
521 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that when counting appeal deadlines, the first day is excluded, so a notice filed the day after the nominal deadline was still on time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal (W. Karanja, JA) on a notice of motion dated 13th February 2026 brought under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, seeking extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal against the judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi (Onesmus Makau, J.) delivered on 26th April 2019 in ELRC Cause No. 415 of 2018. The applicant's counsel had earlier, on 4th December 2025, obtained a 14-day extension of time from the ELRC and filed the Notice of Appeal on 19th December 2025, believing it to be one day late. The court held that under Rule 3 of the Court of Appeal Rules, periods are computed exclusive of the day on which the relevant event or act occurs; the 14-day period expiring nominally on 18th December 2025 therefore excluded the last day, meaning the Notice of Appeal filed on 19th December 2025 was in fact filed within time. The court observed the application was unnecessary and unopposed, but allowed it in terms of prayer 2, ordered service of the Notice of Appeal within 7 days if not already served in compliance with Rule 79, directed compliance with the Rules' timelines for the record of appeal, and made no orders as to costs. The decision affirms the binding computation rule under Rule 3 for all lower courts and parties.

Key legal issues

#
01

Computation of time under Rule 3 of the Court of Appeal Rules

Holding

Where a court grants 14 days' extension by a ruling of 4th December 2025, the period nominally ends on 18th December 2025, but under Rule 3 the last day is excluded, so a Notice of Appeal filed on 19th December 2025 was filed within time.

Reasoning

The court applied Rule 3 of the Court of Appeal Rules, which requires that the period of days be computed exclusive of the day on which the event or act occurs. The extension ruling was made on 4th December 2025; counting 14 days gives 18th December 2025 as the last day. Excluding that last day, the Notice of Appeal filed on 19th December 2025 fell within the extended period, rendering the application unnecessary though allowed.

p. 2
02

Whether extension of time under Rule 4 should be granted

Holding

The application was granted in terms of prayer 2, though the court observed it was unnecessary since the notice was already in time.

Reasoning

The judge noted the application was unopposed and, on his own computation, the Notice of Appeal was already filed within the extended time by operation of Rule 3. He nonetheless allowed the application in terms of prayer 2 and gave directions on service and compliance with the Rules' timelines for the record of appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • In computing periods fixed by the Court of Appeal Rules, the day on which the event or act occurs is excluded from the count, so an act done on the day after the nominal expiry date is within time

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application allowed in terms of prayer 2 (extension of time / deeming of the Notice of Appeal filed 19th December 2025 as duly lodged within time)
  2. 2.If the Notice of Appeal has not been served, it be served within 7 days in compliance with Rule 79 of the Court of Appeal Rules
  3. 3.Applicant to comply with the other timelines set by the Court of Appeal Rules regarding filing and service of the record of appeal
  4. 4.No orders as to costs
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court, Nairobi
ELRC Cause No. 415 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules (extension of time)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nixon Mwai Kimiti v British Army Training Unit Kenya", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of Motion dated 13th February 2026 (Civil Application). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1524/eng@2026-07-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.