Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNot stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Appeal dated 8th May 2024)· [2026] KECA 1293 (KLR)

Sybrin Kenya Limited v The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes

Court of Appeal of Kenya
10 July 2026
2,800 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that services billed only to foreign affiliates count as exported services, so Kenyan VAT does not apply.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This appeal concerned whether services provided by Sybrin Kenya Limited, a Kenyan software and hardware services company subcontracted by its foreign affiliates Sybrin Systems (Proprietary) Limited of South Africa and Sybrin Limited of Guernsey, qualified as exported services exempt from VAT under section 2 of the Value Added Tax Act. Following a VAT verification for January 2016 to December 2019, the Commissioner assessed the appellant at Kshs. 40,689,306.00, contending the services were consumed by Kenyan financial institutions. The Tax Appeals Tribunal found in the appellant's favour, but the High Court (Mabeya, J.) on 17th January 2024 overturned that decision, holding the ultimate consumers were the Kenyan banks. Allowing the appeal on a question of law under section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act, the Court of Appeal examined the agreements between the appellant and the foreign affiliates, which identified the affiliates as customers and required all work to be invoiced to them only. The Court held that the foreign affiliates utilised and consumed the appellant's taxable supplies as primary consumers, and applying the OECD destination principle, tax is determined by the jurisdiction of consumption, here the affiliates' jurisdictions. The Court reversed the High Court's decision, restored the position that the services were exported services, and allowed the appeal with costs to the appellant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appellant's services to its foreign affiliates SSPL and SL constituted exported services under section 2 of the VAT Act

Holding

The services were exported services because they were provided for use or consumption by SSPL (South Africa) and SL (Guernsey), the customers identified in the agreements, and were therefore not subject to VAT.

Reasoning

The Court examined the Memorandi of Agreements between the appellant and the foreign affiliates. The agreements defined the customer as the affiliates' customers in the Kenyan territory and provided that all work be invoiced and collected from the foreign affiliates only, with no direct contractual obligation with the Kenyan customers. The Court held the foreign affiliates utilised and consumed the appellant's taxable supplies as primary consumers. Applying the OECD destination principle, tax is determined by the rules of the jurisdiction of consumption, here the jurisdiction of the affiliate companies.

p. 5
02

Scope of appellate jurisdiction under section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act

Holding

The appeal to the Court of Appeal in tax matters is confined to questions of law; the Court engages with facts only as background and context and to check whether conclusions are supported by evidence or are perverse.

Reasoning

The Court invoked section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act and adopted the summary in Mati vs. Returning Officer Mwingi North Constituency & 2 Others on what constitutes a matter of law, namely interpretation or construction of statutes or their application to facts established by the trial court, without re-evaluating credibility of witnesses.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Under section 2 of the VAT Act, the characterisation of a service as an exported service turns on the place of use or consumption of the service, and where the business agreement identifies the foreign affiliate as the customer, the foreign affiliate is the consumer for VAT purposes.
  • An appeal to the Court of Appeal in tax matters lies on a question of law only under section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is allowed
  2. 2.Costs to the appellant
  3. 3.Orders accordingly
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Not stated
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 56(2) of the Tax Procedures Act (appeal on a question of law only)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sybrin Kenya Limited v The Commissioner of Domestic Taxes", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (Memorandum of Appeal dated 8th May 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/1293/eng@2026-07-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.