Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNairobi Civil Application (unnumbered on the face of the judgment; arises from ELRC Cause No. E043 of 2022)· [2026] KECA 719 (KLR)

Fracht Kenya Limited v Irene Wambui Kaloki

Court of Appeal of Kenya
10 April 2026
877 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to allow a late appeal after more than 20 months of unexplained delay, confirming that unexplained delays can end appeal rights in Kenya.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal (D. K. Musinga, JA & President) delivered at Nairobi on 10th April 2026 on a notice of motion dated 7th February 2025 by which the applicant sought enlargement of time and leave to file a notice of appeal, a record of appeal and a memorandum of appeal out of time against the judgment of Stella Rutto, J. of 10th November 2023 in Nairobi ELRC Cause No. E043 of 2022, in which the respondent's termination was found unfair and special damages of USD 63,950 awarded. The supporting affidavit was sworn by one Joram Nyanzi, whose status was unexplained. The respondent filed no response. The Court applied its settled discretion under Leo Sila Mutiso and the Supreme Court's decision in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat. It found the applicant filed no notice of appeal in time or at all; the annexed notice was undated and apparently unpaid for; the averments concerning delays in obtaining certified proceedings and a sudden change of counsel were unsupported; and the applicant did not explain the period between judgment and the application. The delay exceeded 20 months and was unexplained. The Court held that where delay is inordinate and unexplained, it need not consider the merits of the intended appeal or prejudice to the respondent. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs, the respondent having filed nothing in response.

Key legal issues

#
01

Burden on an applicant for extension of time

Holding

An applicant for extension of time bears the burden of laying a basis to the satisfaction of the Court, explaining the delay to its satisfaction.

Reasoning

The Court restated the factors from Leo Sila Mutiso and Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat: reason for the delay explained to the Court's satisfaction, prejudice to the respondent, whether the application is brought without undue delay, and public interest. On the facts, the applicant filed no notice of appeal in time or at all, offered an undated and apparently unpaid notice of appeal, and the deponent's status was unknown; the averments about obtaining proceedings and a change of counsel were unsupported by material. The delay exceeded 20 months and was unexplained.

p. 2
02

Consequence of inordinate unexplained delay

Holding

Where the delay is inordinate and unexplained, the Court need not consider the merits of the intended appeal or the prejudice to the respondent.

Reasoning

Having found inordinate delay of more than 20 months without satisfactory explanation, the Court held the remaining Salat factors need not be reached. The application was therefore dismissed without an assessment of the arguability of the intended appeal.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where there is inordinate unexplained delay in an application for extension of time, the Court need not consider the chances of success of the intended appeal or the prejudice to the respondent.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 7th February 2025 seeking extension of time and leave to appeal out of time is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs, since the respondent did not file any document in response to the application
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court, Nairobi
ELRC Cause No. E043 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion of the Court of Appeal to enlarge time and grant leave to appeal (the judgment does not cite the specific provision)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Fracht Kenya Limited v Irene Wambui Kaloki", Case Analysis (2026). Nairobi Civil Application (unnumbered on the face of the judgment; arises from ELRC Cause No. E043 of 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/719/eng@2026-04-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.