Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNotice of motion dated 12th August, 2022· [2026] KECA 514 (KLR)

Goerge Muchira Gathumbi v Monicah Njoki Gathumbi

Court of Appeal of Kenya
13 March 2026
2,738 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal dismissed a brother's bid to stop his sister evicting him from family land because you cannot appeal or stay a ruling without first getting permission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Court of Appeal at Nyeri (Mohammed, Kimaru and Muchelule JJA) delivered a single judgment on 13th March 2026 dismissing a notice of motion dated 12th August 2022 brought under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules and Section 3 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act. The applicant, in a family land dispute over L.R. No Kabare/Ngiroche/454 with his biological sister, sought an injunction against eviction and a stay of the ruling of Cherono J. dated 22nd July 2022, which had dismissed his application for stay of execution of a retrial judgment in the respondent's favour. The application was canvassed by written and oral submissions. The Court held on two independent grounds. First, applying Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v EP Oranga, the ruling sought to be stayed was a negative order - it merely dismissed the stay application and directed no party to do, refrain from doing, or pay anything - and was therefore incapable of execution and incapable of being stayed. Second, applying Peter Nyaga Muvake v Joseph Mutunga, an appeal against an order made under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules lies only with leave under Section 75(1) of the Civil Procedure Act; the applicant never sought or obtained leave, so there was no valid notice of appeal and the Court had no jurisdiction. The Court reiterated that Rule 5(2)(b) jurisdiction is original and discretionary, applying the twin tests of an arguable appeal and nugatory outcome. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondent. The respondent had also argued the application was overtaken by events, the applicant having already vacated the suit property following eviction orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction to entertain an application under Rule 5(2)(b) where leave to appeal was not obtained

Holding

The application fails because no valid notice of appeal exists; leave was a prerequisite and was never sought or obtained.

Reasoning

Section 75(1) of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 43 of the Civil Procedure Rules prescribe the orders appealable as of right. The ruling the applicant sought to appeal was made under Order 42 Rule 6 and is not appealable as of right. Following Peter Nyaga Muvake v Joseph Mutunga, leave is a sine qua non to lodging a notice of appeal; without a valid notice of appeal the Court's jurisdiction is not invoked and the stay application is 'dead in the water'.

p. 5
02

Whether a dismissal of an application for stay of execution can itself be stayed

Holding

No; such a dismissal is a negative order incapable of execution and therefore incapable of being stayed.

Reasoning

The Court, applying Western College of Arts and Applied Sciences v EP Oranga, noted that the High Court ruling merely dismissed the applicant's stay application with costs; it ordered no party to do, refrain from doing, or pay anything. There is nothing to execute and nothing capable of being stayed, save the issue of costs.

p. 4
03

Nature of the Court's jurisdiction on Rule 5(2)(b) applications

Holding

The Court exercises original and discretionary jurisdiction, applying its mind de novo, not as an appeal from the trial judge's discretion.

Reasoning

Citing Montague Charles Ruben and Trust Bank Limited v Investech Bank, the Court reiterated that Rule 5(2)(b) jurisdiction is original and discretionary; the twin tests are an arguable (not frivolous) appeal and that the appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory absent stay, assessed against the facts of each case.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An order that merely dismisses an application, directing no party to do or refrain from doing any act or to pay any sum, is a negative order incapable of execution and incapable of being stayed.
  • An appeal against an order made under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules lies only with leave; without leave there is no valid notice of appeal and the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction over the appeal or an application for stay in the intended appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant's application dated 12th August, 2022 is dismissed with costs to the respondent
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court (High Court) at Kerugoya
Ruling dated 22nd July, 2022 (Cherono J.)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules and Section 3 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Goerge Muchira Gathumbi v Monicah Njoki Gathumbi", Case Analysis (2026). Notice of motion dated 12th August, 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/514/eng@2026-03-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.