Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 10th July 2024)· [2026] KECA 446 (KLR)

Andrew Kiprotich Mustuni v Republic

Court of Appeal
6 March 2026
447 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a six-month late murder appeal, holding that financial inability to hire a lawyer validly explains delay.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Eldoret on a Notice of Motion dated 10th July 2024 in which the applicant sought leave to appeal out of time against his conviction and sentence. The applicant had been tried, convicted and sentenced for murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code in Bungoma HCCRC No. 47 of 2008, and in HC Petition No. E81 of 2024 Kemei, J. upheld the conviction and sentenced him to life imprisonment. In support of the application, the applicant attached a supporting affidavit, notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal, and explained that he was unable to secure the services of a lawyer due to financial constraints. Notably, the State, through Principal Prosecution Counsel Mr. Kiarie, supported the application, submitting that the delay in filing had been explained. The court reiterated that the discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 is wide and discretionary and that the guiding principles - length of delay, reasons for delay, possible prejudice, conduct of the parties, balancing of competing interests, the need to protect a party's opportunity to fully litigate, and the chances of success - are not exhaustive. Finding the reason advanced convincing, and the six-month delay not inordinate, the court granted leave. The applicant was directed to file his notice of appeal within 14 days; under rule 64 the Registrar of the High Court is to prepare the record of appeal within 60 days of filing; and the ruling is to be served on the Deputy Registrar, Bungoma High Court, for compliance. No costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay of six months in filing the appeal was explained and not inordinate

Holding

The applicant's reason (inability to secure a lawyer due to financial constraints) convincingly explained the delay, and a six-month delay was not inordinate, warranting extension of time

Reasoning

The court applied the rule 4 discretion, weighing the reason for delay, its length, and the absence of noted prejudice. The applicant had attached a supporting affidavit, notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal. The State itself supported the application, confirming the delay was explained. The court was satisfied the threshold for exercise of discretion was met and granted leave with timelines for filing.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Rule 4 confers a wide discretion; the guiding principles (length of delay, reasons for delay, prejudice, conduct of parties, balancing of competing interests and chances of success) are not exhaustive

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to appeal out of time; applicant to file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of the order
  2. 2.Registrar of the High Court to prepare the record of appeal within 60 days of the filing of the notice of appeal under rule 64
  3. 3.A copy of the ruling to be served on the Deputy Registrar, Bungoma High Court, upon filing of the notice of appeal for compliance
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Bungoma
HC Petition No. E81 of 2024
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Andrew Kiprotich Mustuni v Republic", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 10th July 2024). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/446/eng@2026-03-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.