Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedApplication dated 24th May 2024 (Eldoret)

Kosgei v Republic (Criminal Application E025 of 2025) [2026] KECA 276 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
19 February 2026
222 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a prisoner to appeal late because he was never given the judgment and proceedings he needed to file on time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Eldoret by Mativo JA on an application dated 24th May 2024 by David Kemboi Kosgei seeking extension of time to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The applicant had been convicted of rape by the magistrates' court, and his first appeal to the High Court was unsuccessful - Omondi J. (as she then was) dismissed it in a judgment dated 17th March 2024 in Eldoret HCCRA No. 14 of 2019. The applicant explained the delay in filing his notice and memorandum of appeal on the ground that, although he desired to appeal, he was not supplied with a copy of the High Court judgment or the trial court proceedings. In written submissions dated 10th February 2025, counsel for the respondent conceded the application. Finding the reason offered plausible and satisfactory, the judge exercised discretion in the applicant's favour and ordered that the notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal already filed be admitted out of time and deemed properly filed, directing the applicant to file the record of appeal within 60 days. The ruling is interlocutory and procedural: it does not disturb the High Court's decision, which remains intact pending the substantive appeal, and it resolves no issues on the merits. No costs order was made, no authorities were cited, and no separate opinions exist.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the applicant has offered a plausible and satisfactory reason for the delay warranting extension of time to file his appeal

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether extension of time to file an appeal should be granted

Holding

Extension of time granted; the delay was explained by non-supply of the judgment and proceedings, and the respondent conceded the application.

Reasoning

The applicant explained that although he desired to appeal, he was not supplied with a copy of the High Court judgment and the trial court proceedings, which caused the delay. The respondent's counsel conceded the application in written submissions dated 10th February 2025. Finding the reason plausible and satisfactory, the single judge exercised discretion in the applicant's favour, admitted the notice and memorandum of appeal out of time as properly filed, and directed filing of the record of appeal within 60 days.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a plausible and satisfactory reason is offered for delay in filing an appeal, the Court may exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant and admit the appeal out of time; this interlocutory discretion ruling does not establish a binding precedent on lower courts.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of appeal and the memorandum of appeal filed herein be admitted out of time and the same be deemed as properly filed
  2. 2.The applicant is directed to file the record of appeal within 60 days from today

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Eldoret HCCRA No. 14 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent discretion to extend time for filing an appeal (rule-based extension-of-time jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal)

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

I order that the notice of appeal and the memorandum of appeal filed herein be admitted out of time and the same be deemed as properly filed.
p. 1final orders - extension of time granted
The applicant is directed to file the record of appeal within 60 days from today.
p. 1final orders - timeline for record of appeal
The reason in support of the application is plausible and satisfactory. I am inclined to exercise my discretion in the applicant's favour.
p. 1extension of time - sufficient reason

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The judgment is dated 19th February 2026 although the application is dated 24th May 2024 and submissions dated 10th February 2025 - a substantial internal delay not explained on the face of the ruling.

minor

The ruling does not state the case number of the application before the Court of Appeal, only the application date.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kosgei v Republic (Criminal Application E025 of 2025) [2026] KECA 276 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Application dated 24th May 2024 (Eldoret). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/276/eng@2026-02-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.