Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNot stated in the judgment

Thomas (Deceased) v Agricultural Finance Corporation & another (Civil Appeal (Application) 201 of 2023) [2026] KECA 10 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
21 January 2026
353 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that an appeal survives a party's death if a legal representative is substituted within twelve months, using a limited grant.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Charles Ogola Thomas, the appellant in a pending appeal, died on 25th December 2023. On 11th December 2024, Fredrick Ochieng’ Ogola applied under Rule 102(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules for leave to be substituted as the appellant in place of the deceased. In support, he produced a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem issued on 16th August 2024 in Migori CMCC Misc Succession Cause E098 of 2024, which vested him with legal authority to represent the deceased's estate in the appeal. The court, sitting at Kisumu and comprising L. Kimaru, JA, noted that Rule 102(1) provides that an appeal does not abate on the death of an appellant or respondent but that the legal representative must be joined on application; under Rule 102(2), an appeal abates if no application is made within twelve months of death. The court was satisfied that the applicant held a valid limited grant conferring authority to represent the estate and that the application had been brought within the twelve-month window. Holding that the application had merit and that substitution served the interests of justice so that the appeal could proceed to hearing and determination, the court allowed the application and ordered that the applicant replace the deceased as appellant. It made no order as to costs. The ruling is procedural and does not disturb any decision below; its significance lies in confirming that a limited grant ad litem is sufficient authority for substitution under Rule 102(1) where the application is filed within the statutory period.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the applicant, holding a limited grant of letters of administration ad litem, should be substituted for the deceased appellant in the pending appeal
  2. 2.Whether the substitution application was made within the twelve-month period prescribed by Rule 102(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key legal issues

#
01

Substitution of a deceased appellant by his legal representative under Rule 102(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Holding

A limited grant of letters of administration ad litem suffices to confer legal authority to represent the deceased's estate for purposes of substitution, and an application made within twelve months of death is in time and should be allowed.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant had obtained a limited grant ad litem in Migori CMCC Misc Succession Cause E098 of 2024, granting him legal authority to represent the estate. Because the application was lodged within twelve months of the appellant's death on 25th December 2023, the appeal had not abated and substitution was in the interests of justice.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal does not abate on the death of a party; the legal representative of the deceased must be made a party on application, and failure to apply within twelve months of death causes the appeal to abate.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for substitution is allowed
  2. 2.Fredrick Ochieng’ Ogola shall substitute Charles Ogola Thomas (deceased) as the appellant in this appeal
  3. 3.No orders as to costs

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 102(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

An appeal shall not abate on the death of the appellant or respondent but the Court shall, on application of any intended person, cause the legal representative of the deceased person to be made a party in the place of the deceased.
p. 1Rule 102(1) - non-abatement of appeals and substitution
The Applicant, Fredrick Ochieng’ Ogola shall substitute Charles Ogola Thomas (deceased) as the appellant in this appeal. There shall be no orders as to costs.
p. 2Final orders - substitution granted, no costs

Issues in the judgment

#
minor

The applicant and the deceased appellant share the same surname and the appeal number, lower court decision and respondent are not identified in the judgment as provided.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Thomas (Deceased) v Agricultural Finance Corporation & another (Civil Appeal (Application) 201 of 2023) [2026] KECA 10 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2026). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2026/10/eng@2026-01-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.