Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal 22 of 2022

Mwithalie (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Teresia Ntundu) v Kiringuri & 4 others

Court of Appeal
19 December 2025
2,452 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that grandchildren cannot inherit from a grandparent's estate unless they prove they were dependants under section 29 of the Law of Succession Act.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, suing as legal representative of the estate of Teresia Ntundu, appealed a ruling of Otieno J of the High Court at Meru dated 18 November 2021 in Succession Cause No. 517 of 2008, which dismissed his claim for provision from the estate of Gedion M'Arungu. At trial the appellant abandoned his prayer for revocation of the grant issued to the 1st respondent (the deceased's widow) and pursued only a claim for provision as a beneficiary. He asserted his mother, Teresia Ntundu, was a daughter of the deceased, so her estate was entitled to inherit. The trial court found uncontroverted evidence that Teresia was the 1st respondent's daughter from a previous relationship, born out of wedlock before her marriage to the deceased, and therefore not a child of the deceased. The Court of Appeal, comprising Mohammed, Kimaru and Muchelule JJA, framed a single issue: whether the appellant established that he was a dependant of the deceased under section 29 of the Law of Succession Act. Applying Selle v Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd, the court deferred to the trial court's credibility findings, holding that Teresia was not a daughter of the deceased and that no evidence showed she had been taken in by the deceased as his own child. Consequently, the appellant, as a grandchild, had no direct claim to the estate. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs, the court noting this was a family dispute.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the appellant established that he was a dependant of the deceased and therefore entitled to inherit from his estate

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appellant, a grandchild, qualified as a dependant under section 29 of the Law of Succession Act

Holding

He did not; his mother was found to be born out of wedlock and not a child of the deceased, and no evidence showed she was taken in by the deceased as his own child

Reasoning

The court applied section 29, noting grandchildren qualify only if taken into the family as the deceased's own or maintained by him immediately prior to death. The trial court, having seen and heard the witnesses, believed the 1st respondent's testimony that Teresia Ntundu was her daughter from a previous relationship. The appellate court deferred to that credibility finding and found no persuasive evidence of adoption or maintenance.

p. 4
02

The duty of a first appellate court

Holding

The court applied the Selle principles: reconsider and evaluate the evidence itself while making due allowance for not having seen or heard the witnesses

Reasoning

The court restated the classic Selle formulation that a first appeal is by way of retrial, but that the appellate court is not bound by trial findings of fact only where the trial judge clearly failed to take account of particular circumstances or probabilities. It then deferred to the trial court's assessment of demeanour and credibility.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A grandchild has no direct claim to a deceased's estate unless the grandchild establishes dependant status under section 29 of the Law of Succession Act, e.g. that the deceased took the grandchild's parent into his family as his own or maintained the grandchild immediately prior to death
  • On a first appeal, an appellate court defers to the trial court's findings on witness credibility where the trial court saw and heard the witnesses

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs, the matter being a family dispute

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority

Wrote the judgment

majority
majority
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Meru
Succession Cause No. 517 of 2008 (ruling dated 18th November 2021)
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal under the Law of Succession Act / Court of Appeal jurisdiction (no specific constitutional provision cited)

Relief refused

#

Revocation of the confirmed grant issued to the 1st respondent and fresh re-distribution of the estate

Appellant failed to establish his late mother was a dependant of the deceased; as a grandchild he has no direct claim

p. 5

Costs

No orders as to costs as this was a family dispute

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

In the premises therefore, we nd no merit with the appeal. It is hereby dismissed but with no orders as to costs as this was a family dispute.
p. 5Final orders - dismissal of appeal with no costs order
Having pegging his right to inherit the estate of the deceased on his late mother’s status as a dependant, and having failed to do so, the appellant as a grandchild has no direct claim to the estate of the deceased.
p. 5Grandchild's lack of direct claim to estate
Grandchildren also qualify to be considered as dependants if “the deceased had taken into his family as his own” or “were being maintained by the deceased immediately prior to his death.” (see section 29(b)).
p. 4Section 29 dependants - grandchildren
As the rst appellate court, having not had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses, we defer to the nding made by the trial court regarding assessment of the credibility of the witness.
p. 4Deference to trial court credibility findings

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwithalie (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Teresia Ntundu) v Kiringuri & 4 others", Case Analysis (2025). Civil Appeal 22 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/2227/eng@2025-12-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.