Sai Electricals & Hardware Limited v Kenya Union of Commercial, Food & Allied Workers
The bottom line
#Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed a company to appeal late because it acted quickly after discovering its lawyer had failed to file the notice of appeal.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the delay of about 37 days in lodging the notice of appeal was excusable
The delay was not inordinate and was excusable because the applicant promptly followed up with its former advocate, discovered the inaction within days, and moved swiftly to instruct new advocates and file the application.
The court found the applicant was not indolent: it followed up with its erstwhile advocate only 4 days after the expiry of the period for filing the notice of appeal, and upon discovering that no notice had been lodged, it promptly instructed current advocates who filed the notice and the application. A litigant should not be penalised for an advocate's inaction where the litigant remains vigilant.
Legal principles established
#- Any delay in filing an appeal must be satisfactorily explained; a plausible and satisfactory explanation is the key that unlocks the court's flow of discretionary favour.
Court orders
#- 1.Extension of time granted to lodge and serve notice of appeal
- 2.The notice of appeal dated 29th July 2025 deemed as properly filed and served
- 3.Applicants directed to file and serve a record of appeal within 30 days of the ruling
- 4.Costs shall abide the appeal
- On appeal from
- Employment & Labour Relations Court
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (extension of time)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Sai Electricals & Hardware Limited v Kenya Union of Commercial, Food & Allied Workers", Case Analysis (2025). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/2025/eng@2025-11-27
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.