Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCriminal Application dated 6th November 2023 (Bungoma High Court Criminal Case No. 035 of 2010 appeal)· [2025] KECA 2011 (KLR)

Susan Nyawera Chege v Republic

Court of Appeal of Kenya
19 November 2025
356 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal let an imprisoned man appeal years late and without paying, confirming that poverty and incarceration justify filing appeals out of time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu, delivered by Asike-Makhandia, JA, on 19th November 2025, on an application dated 6th November 2023 by a man convicted of murder and sentenced to death by the High Court at Bungoma in Criminal Case No. 035 of 2010 on 20th December 2020. His sentence was subsequently commuted to life imprisonment by the President. Having missed the time limited for appealing under the Court of Appeal Rules, he sought leave to appeal out of time and to appeal as a pauper, explaining that his incarceration and his family's inability to raise the funds for preparing the record of appeal caused the delay. The respondent opposed, contending that the delay of close to three years was inordinate and the reasons given unsatisfactory. The court acknowledged the delay appeared inordinate but held that the applicant's circumstances - imprisonment and poverty - made the delay understandable, that the applicant has an undoubted constitutional right to exhaust the appellate process, and that the respondent would suffer no prejudice since it would still have its day in court at the hearing of the intended appeal. The application was allowed and the applicant directed to process his appeal within forty-five days. No authority was cited and no costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay of close to three years in filing the notice and memorandum of appeal should be excused

Holding

Yes. Although the delay appears inordinate, the applicant's circumstances as an incarcerated person whose family cannot raise the funds for the record of appeal justify the extension, and the respondent will suffer no prejudice.

Reasoning

The court weighed the length of the delay (nearly three years) against the applicant's personal circumstances: incarceration and inability of his family to raise the amount required to prepare the record of appeal. It found the applicant's right to exhaust the appellate process constitutionally protected and held the respondent would have its day in court at the hearing of the intended appeal, so no prejudice would flow from granting the extension.

p. 1
02

Whether the applicant should be permitted to appeal as a pauper

Holding

Yes, the application to appeal as a pauper was allowed together with the extension of time, in a single disposition.

Reasoning

The application sought leave to appeal out of time and as a pauper. The court accepted the claim of inability to raise the funds required to prepare the record of appeal due to incarceration and family poverty, and allowed the application as prayed, directing processing of the appeal within forty-five days.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An incarcerated appellant has an undoubted constitutional right to exhaust the appellate process, and denial of an extension on that account would be prejudicial to the applicant where the respondent suffers no prejudice.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for leave to appeal out of time and as a pauper is allowed
  2. 2.The applicant is directed to process his appeal within forty-five days from the date of the ruling
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Bungoma
Criminal Case No. 035 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent powers of the Court of Appeal to extend time under the Rules of this court (Court of Appeal Rules) and pauper provisions

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Susan Nyawera Chege v Republic", Case Analysis (2025). Criminal Application dated 6th November 2023 (Bungoma High Court Criminal Case No. 035 of 2010 appeal). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/2011/eng@2025-11-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.