Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCriminal Application (Extension of Time)· [2025] KECA 1664 (KLR)

Simon Chenge Sikowo v Republic

Court of Appeal of Kenya
15 October 2025
483 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that once it delivers final judgment, it cannot reopen the matter, even through a fresh constitutional petition filed in the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Simon Chenge Sikowo was convicted of murder under section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code by the High Court at Bungoma (Omondi H., J) and sentenced to death on 3rd March 2015. His appeal, Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2015, was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 31st January 2020. He and his co-convicts then filed a constitutional petition in the High Court seeking to overturn the death sentence as arbitrary; the High Court declined jurisdiction and dismissed the petition on 23rd January 2023. On 20th January 2025 the applicant moved the Court of Appeal at Kisumu under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules for extension of time to appeal against that dismissal, attributing the delay to lack of funds to instruct counsel. The respondent filed no response. The Court identified the threshold issue as its own jurisdiction. It held that having pronounced final judgment on 31st January 2020, it became functus officio; no pleading device could revive jurisdiction, and the High Court was equally functus officio. The proper course was to seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the Court of Appeal's decision; a constitutional petition in the High Court was a disguised appeal and could not serve. The application was dismissed in its entirety. No costs order was recorded. The decision affirms the finality of appellate judgments and bars litigation of exhausted appeals through constitutional petitions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal over an extension-of-time application following its own final judgment

Holding

The Court lacks jurisdiction; it is functus officio after its judgment of 31st January 2020 affirming the conviction and sentence, and the High Court is equally functus officio and without jurisdiction over the matter.

Reasoning

The Court reasoned that its judgment of 31st January 2020 in Criminal Appeal No. 42 of 2015 finally disposed of the applicant's appeal, exhausting its jurisdiction. The subsequent constitutional petition before the High Court, dismissed on 23rd January 2023, was a disguised second appeal. The only permissible route was an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against that decision. No drafting device could revive jurisdiction in either court.

p. 2
02

Whether the delay in lodging the notice of appeal was excusable

Holding

The application failed on jurisdictional grounds; the explanation of lack of funds did not arise for decision.

Reasoning

Although the applicant attributed the delay to lack of funds to instruct counsel, the Court did not reach the merits of the extension-of-time discretion because the threshold issue of jurisdiction was dispositive. The respondent filed no response, and the Court dismissed the application as lacking merit without engaging the delay explanation.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Once the Court of Appeal has pronounced final judgment on an appeal, it becomes functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to entertain any further plea arising from the same matter, including applications premised on a constitutional petition filed in the High Court
  • A litigant who has exhausted appeals up to the Court of Appeal cannot circumvent the finality of that decision by filing a constitutional petition in the High Court; the only available course is to seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for extension of time is dismissed as lacking merit
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Bungoma
Constitutional Petition (unnumbered in judgment)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules (extension of time to appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Simon Chenge Sikowo v Republic", Case Analysis (2025). Criminal Application (Extension of Time). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1664/eng@2025-10-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.