Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedApplication dated 24th May, 2024 (appeal of Moretet Ole Barta)· [2025] KECA 1629 (KLR)

Moretet Ole Barta (suing As The Legal Representative To The Estate of The Late Oloishuro Ole Barta Kura) v Ali Farah & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
9 October 2025
345 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~1 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to let a law firm stop representing its client because the firm could not prove it had properly served the application on the client.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a single-Judge application before the Court of Appeal at Nakuru by the firm of Ochillo & Co. Advocates, dated 24th May 2024, seeking leave under Rule 23(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules to cease acting for the appellant, Moretet Ole Barta, in a pending appeal. The application was supported by an affidavit of Samuel Ochillo, Advocate, on the grounds that the appellant had refused to give proper instructions and had ignored invitations to attend chambers for case preparation, leaving counsel unable to represent him. The appellant filed no response. Warsame, JA reviewed Rule 23(2), which allows an advocate desiring to cease acting in a civil appeal to apply by notice of motion before a single Judge, with the advocate deemed to have ceased acting upon service of a certified copy of the order. The Judge then turned to Rule 51, which requires that a notice of motion and copies of all affidavits be served on all necessary parties after filing unless otherwise directed. Finding no affidavit of service by the firm and no correspondence indicating the appellant was no longer interested in the case or had ignored counsel's invitations, the court held that the absence of documentary evidence of proper service was fatal to the application. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs on 9th October 2025. The decision underscores that applications to cease acting must be supported by proof of service on the client.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether leave to cease acting may be granted absent proof of service on the client

Holding

The application was dismissed because the advocates did not exhibit an affidavit of service or correspondence showing the appellant had ignored counsel's invitations.

Reasoning

Rule 51 requires a notice of motion and copies of all affidavits to be served on all necessary parties unless otherwise directed. The firm filed no affidavit of service and no correspondence demonstrating that the appellant was no longer interested in the case or had ignored counsel's invitations. Without that documentary evidence, the court could not verify proper service or the appellant's conduct, and declined to grant leave under Rule 23(2).

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An application for leave to cease acting under Rule 23(2) must be supported by documentary evidence that the application and supporting affidavits were properly served on the party concerned, as required by Rule 51 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 24th May, 2024 seeking leave to cease acting for the appellant is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 23(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, application by notice of motion before a single Judge for leave to cease acting

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Moretet Ole Barta (suing As The Legal Representative To The Estate of The Late Oloishuro Ole Barta Kura) v Ali Farah & 1 other", Case Analysis (2025). Application dated 24th May, 2024 (appeal of Moretet Ole Barta). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1629/eng@2025-10-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.