Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 28th March 2025· [2025] KECA 1261 (KLR)

Octavious Muriuki Nderi & 1709 Others v The County Government of Kirinyaga & 4 others

Court of Appeal of Kenya
8 July 2025
782 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed four elderly self-represented litigants to file their notice of appeal 14 days late, showing short, explained delays will be forgiven.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an application by way of a notice of motion dated 28th March 2025, brought under Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, seeking leave to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time. The applicants, four elderly litigants, sued the respondents in 2018 seeking orders of resettlement. The suit was dismissed for non-appearance on 20th March 2023 after a notice to show cause was issued, which the applicants said they never received. They learnt of the dismissal late in 2023 and applied to set it aside; that application was dismissed on 27th February 2025. They then elected to pursue the matter in person, alleging frustration by their former advocate. Their intended appeal was recorded as Civil Appeal No. E053 of 2025, but the notice of appeal was filed and served 14 days out of time. Citing the principles in Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi, Ali-Aroni, JA found the 14-day delay reasonable and not inordinate, observed that the draft memorandum of appeal raised grounds that could not be said to be idle, and noted that the respondents, though served, filed no response. The court allowed the application and directed that the notice of appeal be filed and served within the next 14 days. It made no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 14-day delay in filing and serving the notice of appeal warrants extension of time

Holding

Yes - the delay of 14 days was found reasonable and not inordinate, and the draft memorandum of appeal disclosed arguable grounds

Reasoning

Applying the Leo Sila Mutiso criteria, the court found the 14-day delay short and reasonably explained: the applicants, elderly and litigating in person after alleged frustration by their advocate, moved promptly after the dismissal of their application to set aside the suit's dismissal. The draft memorandum raised non-idle grounds, and the respondents, though served, filed no response and hence showed no prejudice.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules confers an unfettered discretion on the court in applications for extension of time
  • The discretion under Rule 4 is exercised having regard to the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and the degree of prejudice to the respondent

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to file and serve the notice of appeal out of time
  2. 2.Notice of appeal to be filed and served within the next 14 days
  3. 3.No order as to costs
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya (inferable from dismissal of suit and ruling of 27th February 2025)
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Octavious Muriuki Nderi & 1709 Others v The County Government of Kirinyaga & 4 others", Case Analysis (2025). Notice of Motion dated 28th March 2025. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1261/eng@2025-07-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.