Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedApplication dated 24th February 2024 (Court of Appeal, Eldoret)· [2025] KECA 1057 (KLR)

Koitalel Samoei University College v Florence Chemutai & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
12 June 2025
681 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal gave a university extra time to appeal because the delay was caused by court registry failures, not the litigant.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Koitalel Samoei University College applied, by notice dated 24th February 2024, for leave to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time. Judgment in the matter was scheduled for 21st June 2024 but was not delivered; after inquiries the registry indicated a new date of 13th February 2025 and apologised for the delay citing the judge's workload. When the applicant attended on the communicated date, it was informed that judgment had in fact been delivered on 7th November 2024. The applicant filed its notice of appeal and request for proceedings on 19th February 2025 and then sought extension of time, contending the delay arose from miscommunication and that respondents would suffer no prejudice. M. Warsame, JA, sitting as a single judge at Eldoret under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, applied the classic principles in Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi: length of delay, reasons for delay, arguability of the intended appeal, and prejudice to the respondent. He found the applicant had followed the matter with commendable diligence, supported by documentary correspondence, and that the delay was neither inordinate nor the applicant's fault but was entirely attributable to the court's administrative failings. He held it would be manifestly unjust to penalise a litigant for delays caused by the institution from which it seeks justice, noted that the draft memorandum of appeal raised issues warranting consideration, and allowed the application. The applicant was granted 60 days from the date of the order to file the notice and record of appeal, with no orders as to costs. The ruling was dated and delivered at Eldoret on 12th June 2025.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal was excusable

Holding

Yes - the delay was neither inordinate nor attributable to the applicant, but to the court's administrative failings, and good cause was established.

Reasoning

The applicant diligently followed up: it wrote to the court when judgment was not delivered on 21st June 2024, complained about the adjourned date of 13th February 2025, attended court as directed, and filed its notice of appeal promptly upon learning judgment had been delivered on 7th November 2024. Documentary correspondence supported this diligence, and the draft memorandum raised arguable issues.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • In an extension-of-time application under rule 4, a single judge exercises a wide but judicious discretion, considering length of delay, reasons for delay, arguability of the intended appeal, and prejudice to the respondent.
  • Delay attributable wholly to the court's own administrative failings is good cause for extension of time and a litigant should not be penalised for such delay.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is allowed
  2. 2.The applicant is granted leave to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal within 60 days from the date of the order
  3. 3.No orders as to costs
On appeal from
null
null
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules (extension of time)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Koitalel Samoei University College v Florence Chemutai & 1 other", Case Analysis (2025). Application dated 24th February 2024 (Court of Appeal, Eldoret). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/1057/eng@2025-06-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.