Fleet Logistics Limited v Sigma Limited & 3 others (Civil Application E604 of 2024) [2025] KECA 357 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to excuse an eight-month delay in filing an appeal, leaving Fleet Logistics liable for a Kshs. 53.76 million damages award.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the delay of about eight months in filing the notice of appeal should be excused
The delay was inordinate and the explanation neither reasonable nor satisfactory; the applicant, having been aware of the judgment since 5th March 2024 and having enjoyed counsel's services, pursued review and stay before turning to this Court, so the discretion was not exercised in its favour.
The court weighed the four Muringa factors: the delay ran from February to November 2024; the applicant knew of the judgment by early March yet filed no notice of appeal; it instead sought review, which failed, then a Rule 5(2) stay, which also failed; and it had counsel throughout. Even a short unexplained delay of under one month after learning of the judgment would have required extension. The conduct of the party weighed against indulgence.
Legal principles established
#- In an extension-of-time application the court considers the length of delay, prejudice to the respondent, the arguability of the intended appeal and the conduct of the parties.
- Every delay, however short, must be explained.
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 12th November 2024 is dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent
- On appeal from
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Fleet Logistics Limited v Sigma Limited & 3 others (Civil Application E604 of 2024) [2025] KECA 357 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2025). Application dated 12th November 2024. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/357/eng@2025-02-28
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.