Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedSecond Appeal against sentence ( memorandum of appeal on mitigating circumstances)· [2025] KECA 240 (KLR)

Alex Riziki Kitunyi v Republic

Court of Appeal of Kenya
13 February 2025
1,148 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal kept a 20-year defilement sentence intact but ordered it counted from the date of first remand, crediting pre-conviction custody.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant, Alex Riziki Kitunyi, was convicted by the Principal Magistrate's Court at Kimilili of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, the complainant being a 14-year-old girl, and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. His first appeal to the High Court (Wendoh, J.) was dismissed. Before the Court of Appeal at Kisumu, he appealed against sentence only, citing mitigating circumstances including time spent in custody during trial, his status as a first-time offender, and rehabilitation achievements in custody, including a KCSE certificate, bible studies and life skills. The respondent opposed the appeal but conceded that pre-conviction custody should be factored into the sentence computation. The Court held that, as a second appeal, section 361(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code barred it from entertaining an appeal against sentence unless the subordinate court lacked jurisdiction or the sentence was enhanced on first appeal, applying the Supreme Court's decision in Republic v Mwangi (ISLA). The 20-year term was the minimum prescribed by section 8(3), and the appellant had raised no grounds justifying interference; further, the issue had not been raised before the High Court, precluding it on second appeal per Alfayo Gombe Okello v Republic. However, invoking section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the Court directed that the sentence computation commence from 18th March 2013, the date of charging and remand. The appeal on sentence otherwise failed and the conviction and sentence were affirmed, with credit for pre-conviction custody.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal on sentence in a second appeal

Holding

The Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere with a lawful sentence not enhanced on first appeal; the 20-year minimum sentence under section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act stands.

Reasoning

Section 361(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code confines second appeals to matters of law and bars sentence appeals unless the trial court lacked jurisdiction or the sentence was enhanced. Sentencing is a discretion of the trial court which an appellate court interferes with only on concrete grounds. The appellant raised no such grounds, and the issue was not a ground of appeal before the High Court, precluding it on second appeal.

p. 2
02

Credit for time spent in custody before conviction

Holding

The period spent in remand from the date of charge must be factored into computation of the sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Reasoning

The respondent conceded this ground. The Court found it consistent with the proviso to section 333(2), which allows pre-conviction custody to be taken into account. It directed that the 20-year sentence run from 18th March 2013, the date the appellant was charged and remanded in custody throughout the trial.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • On a second appeal the Court of Appeal cannot entertain an appeal against sentence unless the subordinate court had no jurisdiction to pass it or the sentence was enhanced on first appeal.
  • An issue not raised at the earliest opportunity and not canvassed before the first appellate court cannot be raised for the first time on second appeal.
  • Under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code the period a convict spends in custody before conviction must be taken into account in computing the sentence.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Computation of the appellant's sentence of 20 years imprisonment to commence from 18th March 2013, the date he was charged and remanded in custody throughout his trial
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya
Jurisdiction invoked
Second appeal under section 361(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Alex Riziki Kitunyi v Republic", Case Analysis (2025). Second Appeal against sentence ( memorandum of appeal on mitigating circumstances). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2025/240/eng@2025-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.