Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment (Motion on notice under rules 4, 5(2)(b) and 47 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022)· [2024] KECA 1454 (KLR)

Ndung’u & another v Gathii (Civil Application E090 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1454 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
18 October 2024
941 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal gave landowners nearly a year late to appeal because their lawyer failed to file, sparing them from eviction.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Joseph Nyaga Ndungu and Mugo Ndungu moved the Court of Appeal at Nyeri under rules 4, 5(2)(b) and 47 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 seeking an extension of time of 21 days to file a Notice of Appeal against the judgment of Mutungi, J. in Kerugoya ELC Appeal No. 11 of 2022, delivered on 12th October 2023, which had dismissed their appeal against a Chief Magistrate's decision ordering their eviction from land they claimed to have occupied since 1960. They attributed the failure to appeal to their advocates, who despite being instructed and paid did not file the appeal; they learned of the omission when served with an eviction notice in September 2024. The respondent opposed, arguing the applicants were present at delivery of judgment, their stay application had been dismissed, they had filed a separate pending suit at Gichugu (PM ELCC No. E010 of 2024) which they did not disclose, and the application was an abuse of process. Applying the classic principles in Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi - length of delay, reason for delay, arguability, and prejudice - Ole Kantai, JA held the explanation that the delay was occasioned by the advocates' failure to act was reasonable, so the roughly 11-month delay was not inordinate. Though he doubted the prospects of a second appeal confined to issues of law, he treated arguability as a secondary consideration. The application was allowed: Notice of Appeal to be lodged within 14 days, the appeal within a further 14 days, with costs of the motion in the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the delay of about 11 months in filing the Notice of Appeal was adequately explained

Holding

Yes - the applicants' belief that their advocate had filed the appeal, discovered only when served with an eviction notice, was a reasonable explanation and the delay was not inordinate.

Reasoning

The applicants instructed a lawyer and paid fees, believing an appeal had been lodged. They learned otherwise only upon being served with an eviction notice, whereupon they engaged another lawyer. The court accepted this as a reasonable explanation attributable to the advocate's failure, and held the resulting delay of about 11 months was not inordinate in the circumstances.

p. 3
02

Whether the prospects of success of the intended second appeal should bar the extension

Holding

No - although the judge had doubts about a second appeal raising only issues of law succeeding, prospects are a secondary consideration in an extension-of-time application.

Reasoning

The court examined the draft Memorandum of Appeal containing 14 grounds and, noting the intended appeal was a second appeal in which only issues of law may be raised, expressed doubt about its prospects. However, it held that this factor is secondary when dealing with an application for extension of time and did not, standing alone, justify refusal.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • In deciding an application for extension of time to appeal, the court considers: the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the chances of the appeal succeeding, and the degree of prejudice to the respondent.
  • The chances of the appeal succeeding are a secondary consideration in an application for extension of time.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Motion is allowed; extension of time granted to file Notice of Appeal
  2. 2.Notice of Appeal to be lodged within fourteen (14) days
  3. 3.The appeal to be filed within fourteen (14) days thereafter
  4. 4.Costs of the Motion to be in the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 4
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 5(2)(b)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 47

Cases cited (1)

  • Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi
    [1999] 2 EA 231
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Kerugoya ELC Appeal No. 11 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 4, 5(2)(b) and 47 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndung’u & another v Gathii (Civil Application E090 of 2024) [2024] KECA 1454 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment (Motion on notice under rules 4, 5(2)(b) and 47 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1454/eng@2024-10-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.