Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedSecond appeal from High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Njuguna, J.), judgment delivered 7th February 2019· [2024] KECA 1418 (KLR)

Ashwin Bhanderi & 2 others v Benvar Estates Limited

Court of Appeal of Kenya
11 October 2024
1,584 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that a default judgment entered after proper service of summons stands, and second appeals only examine questions of law.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a second appeal, brought under Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act, from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Njuguna, J.) delivered on 7th February 2019. The underlying dispute concerned a claim by Benvar Estates Limited against Ashwin Bhanderi, Deepak Bhanderi and Bhanderi Enterprises Limited for an unpaid balance of Kshs.1,347,064 for building stones supplied, evidenced by postdated cheques that were stopped. Default judgment was entered after service of summons; the magistrate set it aside on the appellants' application for leave to defend, finding a triable issue and defective service on the corporate defendant; the High Court, on the respondent's first appeal, found service on the two directors valid under Order 5 rule 3, held the judgment regular under Order 10 rules 4 and 10, set aside the magistrate's ruling and allowed the appeal. The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous judgment of the full bench (Kairu, ole Kantai and Mativo, JJ.A), reaffirmed that its mandate on a second appeal is confined to matters of law only. It found the affidavit of service conclusive of proper service and held that the magistrate erred in setting aside a regularly entered default judgment in a liquidated-sum suit where the appellants had failed to enter appearance or file a defence. The Court found the appeal had no merit, dismissed it, and awarded the respondent costs of the appeal and of the courts below.

Key legal issues

#
01

Scope of the Court's mandate on a second appeal

Holding

The Court deals only with issues of law on a second appeal under Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Reasoning

Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act limits second appeals to grounds that the decision was contrary to law, failed to determine a material issue of law, or involved a substantial procedural error. The Court reaffirmed its settled position, citing Leting v Express (K) Ltd and earlier authority, that findings of fact of the lower courts are not open to re-examination absent perversity or failure to consider material matters.

p. 3
02

Sufficiency of service of summons on the appellants

Holding

Service on the first and second appellants, who were directors of the third appellant company, constituted proper service.

Reasoning

The process server deponed that he visited the appellants' offices, personally served the first and second appellants with the summons and accompanying documents, knew them from prior service, recorded one appellant's telephone number, and was told the documents would be forwarded to their lawyers. The affidavit of service was unchallenged and supported regular entry of default judgment.

p. 4
03

Whether the magistrate erred in setting aside the regularly entered default judgment

Holding

The magistrate was wrong to set aside a judgment that had been regularly entered after proper service and default in entering appearance.

Reasoning

Once proper service was established and the appellants failed to enter appearance or file a defence in a liquidated-sum suit, the respondent was entitled to request judgment in default. The Judge correctly applied Order 10 rules 4 and 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules in finding the judgment regular, and the Court of Appeal agreed with the Judge's setting aside of the magistrate's ruling.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • On a second appeal, the Court of Appeal confines itself to matters of law only, unless it is shown that the courts below considered matters they should not have, failed to consider matters they should have, or that the decision is perverse.
  • Where a right of appeal is confined to questions of law only, an appellate court must accept the findings of fact of the lower courts and should not interfere unless it is apparent that on the evidence no reasonable tribunal could have reached that conclusion.
  • A default judgment entered after proper service of summons on defendants who fail to enter appearance in a suit for a liquidated sum is regularly entered and should not be set aside.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed
  2. 2.Respondent awarded costs of the appeal
  3. 3.Respondent awarded costs in the courts below
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 72 of the Civil Procedure Act (second appeal from a decree passed in appeal by the High Court, on grounds of law only)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ashwin Bhanderi & 2 others v Benvar Estates Limited", Case Analysis (2024). Second appeal from High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Njuguna, J.), judgment delivered 7th February 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1418/eng@2024-10-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.