Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application (rule 5(2)(b)) dated 14th November 2023· [2024] KECA 1410 (KLR)

Homescope Properties & 1 other v David Gachuki & Pamela Odera (sued As Chairman & Secretary of Karen Ngong View Estate ) & 1 other

Court of Appeal
11 October 2024
1,035 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to stop a ruling blocking an estate's access road, because the situation could easily be reversed if the appeal later succeeds.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a rule 5(2)(b) application before the Court of Appeal at Nairobi in which Homescope Properties Limited and Dr. Paul Ochanda Saoke, for residents of Eve Gardens Estate, sought stay of execution of an Environment and Land Court judgment of 5th October 2023 and an injunction restraining officials of Karen Ngong View Estate from enforcing a notice denying the residents access to a road passing through Karen Ngong View Estate within L.R. No. 12882. The ELC had dismissed the applicants' suit, holding that the contentious road is a private road exclusively serving Karen Ngong View Estate, and that Eve Gardens Estate's access is through Jogoo Road in Kajiado County. The applicants contended that the intended appeal was arguable, particularly on the interpretation of Section 9 of the Public Roads and Roads of Access Act, and that it would be rendered nugatory without the orders. The Court of Appeal, in a single judgment of the bench of Gatembu Kairu, Achode and Muchelule, JJA, applied the settled two-limb test from Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter. It accepted the appeal was arguable, noting one arguable ground suffices, but held that what was sought to be stayed was reversible, since the barriers blocking access could easily be removed if the appeal succeeded. The application was accordingly dismissed with no orders as to costs, given that the parties are residents welfare associations.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal is arguable

Holding

The intended appeal is arguable, including on the interpretation of Section 9 of the Public Roads and Roads of Access Act, but arguability alone does not secure the orders

Reasoning

The Court found from the Memorandum of Appeal that the learned ELC Judge may have erred in his interpretation of Section 9 of the Public Roads and Roads of Access Act and in concluding that the contentious road is private. Citing Transouth Conveyors, it held one arguable ground suffices, and an arguable appeal need not necessarily succeed.

p. 2
02

Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if the orders are not granted

Holding

The appeal would not be rendered nugatory because the position sought to be stayed or injuncted is reversible

Reasoning

It was common ground that the road through Karen Ngong View Estate is an alternative access route, Eve Gardens Estate having access through Jogoo Road. If the appeal succeeds, the barriers blocking access can be ordered removed and are easily removable. Both limbs of the rule 5(2)(b) test must be satisfied; the second failed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) need not establish many arguable grounds; a single arguable ground suffices
  • Whether the success of an appeal will be rendered nugatory must be assessed on the circumstances of each particular case, considering whether what is sought to be stayed is reversible

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicants' application dated 14th November 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules (stay of execution and injunction pending appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Homescope Properties & 1 other v David Gachuki & Pamela Odera (sued As Chairman & Secretary of Karen Ngong View Estate ) & 1 other", Case Analysis (2024). Civil Application (rule 5(2)(b)) dated 14th November 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1410/eng@2024-10-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.