Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Appeal No. Nyeri 323 of 2019 (consolidated with Civil Appeal No. Nyeri 331 of 2019)· [2024] KECA 1363 (KLR)

Njoroge v Teachers Service Commission & another; Mwangi & another (Interested Parties) (Civil Appeal 323 & 331 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2024] KECA 1363 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
4 October 2024
5,719 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~23 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal voided a teacher's TSC disciplinary process for procedural breaches, but scrapped the Kshs.1.6 million general damages award.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Two cross-appeals against the judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri (Nzioki Wa Makau, J.) of 15th May 2019 were consolidated. The ELRC had declared the continued suspension of Samwel Maina Njoroge, a school Principal interdicted and suspended over allegations of sexual harassment of students, null and void, ordered his reinstatement to the payroll, arrears of salary, deployment letter, general damages of Kshs.1,600,080 and costs. The Court of Appeal, hearing the matter as a first appeal, re-evaluated the evidence and held that the Teachers Service Commission had breached its own Code of Regulations at every stage: the anonymous letters initiating the complaints were neither served on the appellant nor produced in court; he was given minutes rather than the seven days required to appear before the investigators; he received about 15 days' notice of the disciplinary hearing instead of at least one month; the Board of Management was excluded contrary to Regulation 146(3)(a); and an investigator sat twice in the process contrary to Regulation 146(12). The interdiction, suspension and the sentence flowing from them were therefore a nullity. However, the Court agreed that general damages are not recoverable for breach of an employment contract, citing Kenya Tourist Development Corporation v Sundowner Lodge Limited, and set aside the Kshs.1,600,080 award. The remainder of the trial court's awards, including entitlement to salary, allowances and dues up to redeployment as a teacher, was left undisturbed, since the redeployment meant he could not return as Principal. Both appeals partly succeeded, with each party bearing its own costs of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Fairness and legality of the disciplinary process against the teacher

Holding

The investigations, interdiction and suspension breached the TSC Code of Regulations and denied the appellant a fair hearing; they were a nullity.

Reasoning

The appellant was not served with the anonymous letters or leaflets initiating the complaint as required under Regulation 146(6) of the CORT; he was given only about 20 minutes to appear before the investigating team instead of the at least seven days allowed under Regulation 146(6)(c); the notice for the disciplinary hearing gave him about 15 days instead of the at least one month required; the Board of Management was not involved as required under Regulation 146(3)(a); and an investigator sat on both the initial investigation and the County Discipline Committee contrary to Regulation 146(12).

p. 11
02

Consequences of a null disciplinary process on the punishment imposed

Holding

If the interdiction and suspension were a nullity, the sentence imposed under them was equally a nullity, and the trial judge erred in upholding it.

Reasoning

Having found the process flawed and illegal, the learned Judge nonetheless stated that the punishment meted out was in terms of the law and CORT. The Court of Appeal held that a punishment flowing from a null process cannot stand; the appellant was therefore entitled to his salary, allowances and dues as principal up to the time he completed the suspension and received redeployment as a teacher.

p. 11
03

Whether general damages were properly awarded for breach of the employment contract

Holding

The award of general damages of Kshs.1,600,080.00 was made in error and was set aside.

Reasoning

The Court agreed with the 1st respondent's submission, supported by Kenya Tourist Development Corporation v Sundowner Lodge Limited, that general damages are not recoverable in cases of alleged breach of contract. Damages arising from breach of contract are usually quantifiable, and an award of general damages would amount to duplication. However, the Court found that reinstatement/payroll issues had been pleaded and were supported by evidence, so the rest of the award remained undisturbed.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a disciplinary process contravenes the statutory provisions governing it, the resulting decision is a nullity and the court must intervene.
  • General damages are not recoverable in suits founded on breach of an employment contract.
  • On a first appeal, the appellate court must reconsider and evaluate all the evidence tendered before the trial court and draw its own conclusions, while bearing in mind the trial court's advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal by Samwel Maina Njoroge allowed in part: the finding of the trial court that the sentence meted out was in terms of the law and CORT is set aside, the interdiction and suspension having been held a nullity.
  2. 2.The award of general damages of Kshs.1,600,080.00 set aside.
  3. 3.The rest of the trial court's award remains undisturbed, including reinstatement to payroll/arrears entitlements as varied by the court's findings on salary, allowances and dues.
  4. 4.Each party to bear its own costs of the appeal.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 237(2)(e)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 50
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 53
  • Teachers Service Commission Act
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 143(3)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 146(3)(a)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 146(6)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 146(6)(c)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 146(12)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Regulation 148(1)
  • Teachers Service Commission Code of Regulations (CORT)Thirty-fifth Schedule
  • Employment Act, 2007Section 49

Cases cited (10)

  • Selle & Another -vs- Associated Motor Boat Company Limited & Others
    [1968] EA 123
  • W.J. & Another v Astarikoh Henry Amkoah & Others
  • Onyango Oloo -vs- Attorney General
    [1986-1989] EA 456
  • Judicial Service Commission -vs- Daniel Vihenja
    [2020] eKLR
  • Caltex Oil (Kenya) Limited -vs- Rono Limited
    [2016] eKLR
  • Aga Wanjiru Mwaniki -vs- Jane Wanjiru Mwaniki
    [1997] eKLR
  • Kenya Tourist Development Corporation -vs- Sundowner Lodge Limited
    [2018] eKLR
  • Walter Musi Anyanje -vs- Hilton International Kenya Ltd & Another
    Civil Appeal No. 269 of 2003
  • Kenya Ports Authority -vs- Edward Otieno
    Civil Appeal No. 120 of 1997
  • Addis -vs- Gramophone Company
    [1909] AC 458
On appeal from
Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya at Nyeri
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Court of Appeal under the Court of Appeal's appellate jurisdiction (the judgment describes the matter as 'a first appeal'); no specific constitutional or statutory article is quoted.

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njoroge v Teachers Service Commission & another; Mwangi & another (Interested Parties) (Civil Appeal 323 & 331 of 2019 (Consolidated)) [2024] KECA 1363 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Civil Appeal No. Nyeri 323 of 2019 (consolidated with Civil Appeal No. Nyeri 331 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1363/eng@2024-10-04

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.