Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KECA 1324 (KLR)

Josephine Wamwathi v Stephen Mwangi Ndirangu & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
27 September 2024
540 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to substitute a deceased appellant because the appeal had already died in law after no substitution application was made within twelve months of death.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a notice of motion dated 11th June 2024, Peter Kamau Ndrirangu, described as the son of the deceased appellant and a co-administrator of a related estate, sought to substitute the deceased appellant in an appeal before the Court of Appeal at Nakuru, relying on Rule 49 and the Probate and Administration Rules. The appellant had died on 29th August 2020. The respondents opposed through a replying affidavit sworn by Charles Gakuhi Chege, contending that the notice of appeal had not been served, the record of appeal was filed and served out of time and after the appellant's death, the substitution application was incompetent, and the appeal had abated. The court applied the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, which provide that an appeal shall not abate on the death of a party, but shall abate if no application is made within twelve months of death. The appeal therefore abated on 29th August 2021. The applicant was not the legal representative of the deceased's estate and brought the application 2 years and 9 months after abatement, as an interested person. Applying Mehta vs Shah and Said Sweilem Gheithan Saanum, the court held that abatement is a matter of law and a suit that has abated ceases to exist in the eyes of the law, with proceedings taken thereafter being a nullity. The court could not substitute a party in a non-existent appeal. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appeal abated and whether substitution could be granted after abatement

Holding

The appeal abated one year after the appellant's death on 29th August 2021; the application, brought 2 years and 9 months after abatement by a person who is not the legal representative, was incompetent because no substitution is possible in an appeal that no longer exists in law

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 provide that an appeal shall not abate on death, but abates if no application is made within twelve months. The applicant brought the application as an interested person, not as the legal representative, and long after abatement. Relying on Mehta vs Shah and Said Sweilem, the court held that a suit which has abated ceases to exist in law and proceedings taken in it are a nullity, so the application had to be dismissed.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal abates one year after the death of an appellant if no application for substitution of the legal representative is made within twelve months of the death, and a suit that has abated ceases to exist in law
  • A court cannot substitute a party in an appeal that has abated and no longer exists

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application for substitution of the deceased appellant was dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondents
Jurisdiction invoked
Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (provisions on death of a party to an appeal and revival of an abated appeal), invoked through a notice of motion under Rule 49 and the Probate and Administration Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Josephine Wamwathi v Stephen Mwangi Ndirangu & 1 other", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/1324/eng@2024-09-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.