Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowed· [2024] KECA 746 (KLR)

Chesingei alias Joseph Kimutai Suter v County Land Registrar, Elgeyo Marakwet County & 2 others (Civil Application E057 of 2023) [2024] KECA 746 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
21 June 2024
1,021 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal in Nakuru struck out a notice of appeal because the intending appellants served it late, confirming the seven-day service rule is strict.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nakuru (Ole Kantai, Ochieng and Korir, JJ.A) on a Notice of Motion dated 1st November 2023 seeking to strike out a notice of appeal filed by the respondents on 9th October 2023 against the judgment of L. N. Waithaka, J. in ELC Cause No. E006 of 2022. The applicant's complaint was that the notice of appeal, though filed on 9th October 2023, was not served on him until 28th October 2023, well beyond the seven days prescribed by Rule 79(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022. The respondents filed no response and did not appear at the hearing. The court found it undisputed that service occurred more than seven days after lodging the notice, constituting failure to take an essential step in the proceedings within the prescribed time under Rule 86. The respondents offered no explanation for the delay. Applying the principle that justice delayed is justice denied, drawn from Martin Kabaya v David Mungania Kiambi, the court allowed the application and struck out the notice of appeal filed on 9th October 2023, with costs to the applicant pursuant to Rule 85(2). The decision does not disturb the judgment of the Environment and Land Court; it merely removes the respondents' notice of appeal, and no costs or orders relating to the underlying suit were made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether late service of a notice of appeal (beyond the seven days prescribed by Rule 79) is a ground for striking it out under Rule 86

Holding

Yes. Service within seven days is an essential step in the proceedings; where it is not taken within the prescribed time and the intended appellants offer no explanation for the delay, the notice of appeal will be struck out.

Reasoning

Rule 79(1) requires an intended appellant to serve the notice of appeal on all persons directly affected before or within seven days of lodging it. The court found it undisputed that service occurred after more than seven days. Rule 86 permits a person affected to apply to strike out a notice where an essential step has not been taken within the prescribed time. The respondents filed no response and gave no explanation for the delay in service, and the application was made within the thirty-day window under the proviso to Rule 86.

p. 2
02

Timeliness of appellate proceedings

Holding

Judicial proceedings must be concluded in a timely fashion; unexplained delay by an intending appellant burdens the respondent and contributes to court backlog.

Reasoning

Relying on Martin Kabaya v David Mungania Kiambi, the court endorsed the principle that justice delayed is justice denied. Litigants are vexed where those who summon them to proceedings then go to sleep, leaving proceedings alive but comatose. This supports strict compliance with prescribed timelines for service of a notice of appeal, which the respondents failed to observe without explanation.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An intended appellant must serve the notice of appeal on all persons directly affected by the appeal before or within seven days of lodging it under Rule 77, and failure to take this essential step within the prescribed time exposes the notice to striking out under Rule 86.
  • An application to strike out a notice of appeal under Rule 86 must be brought within thirty days of service of the notice of appeal or record of appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of appeal filed on 9th October 2023 is struck out
  2. 2.The respondents shall bear the costs of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 77
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 79
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 85(2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 86

Cases cited (4)

  • Mistry Premji Ganji (Investments) Limited v Kenya National Highways Authority
    [2019] eKLR
  • Daniel Nkirimpa Monirel v Sayialel Ole Koilel & Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Selestica Limited v Gold Rock Development Limited
    [2015] eKLR
  • Martin Kabaya v David Mungania Kiambi
    Nyeri Civil Application 12 of 2015
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court
ELC Cause No. E006 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 - application to strike out a notice of appeal

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chesingei alias Joseph Kimutai Suter v County Land Registrar, Elgeyo Marakwet County & 2 others (Civil Application E057 of 2023) [2024] KECA 746 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/746/eng@2024-06-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.