Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KECA 706 (KLR)

Mary Achieng Ngiela (suing As The Legal Administrator of Joseph Ngiela Mbori – Deceased) v Bernard Ouma Mboya & 1 other

Court of Appeal of Kenya
21 June 2024
2,469 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal struck out a notice of appeal filed by non-parties, confirming that outsiders must first seek leave to join a case before appealing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Okwengu, Omondi and Ngugi, JJ.A) on a Notice of Motion dated 5th April 2023 under Rules 44, 47 and 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules seeking to strike out a Notice of Appeal dated 7th March 2023 lodged by respondents who were never parties to Homa Bay ELC Case No. 47 of 2021 (O.S). The underlying suit concerned adverse-occupation claims over parcel Central Kasipul/Kamuma/13 under the Limitation of Actions Act, in which judgment was entered against Sophia Madewa Amayi on 7th March 2023. The Court first held that the striking-out application was competently filed within the 30-day window prescribed by the proviso to Rule 86, that proviso being mandatory per Joyce Bochere Nyamweya. On the merits, applying Alfred Njau on locus standi, the Court held that Rule 77 does not permit a stranger to the proceedings to lodge an appeal: a non-party whose rights are affected must first seek leave to be enjoined at the appellate stage. The Court distinguished the Migwalla/Onyuka authorities relied on by the respondents, which concerned estate beneficiaries replacing deceased parties, and found that the respondents were aware of the proceedings - as shown by a Land Registrar's visitation to the suit property and their filing the notice two days after judgment, the same day as the defendant - yet made no application to be enjoined. Their approach was described as lacklustre and undeserving of indulgence. The Court allowed the applicant's motion and struck out the respondents' notice of appeal dated 7th March 2023, effectively precluding their intended appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Timeliness of the application under Rule 86

Holding

The application, lodged 5 April 2023 after service of the notice of appeal on 10 March 2023, was within the 30-day window and therefore competently before the Court.

Reasoning

Rule 86 prohibits striking-out applications brought after expiry of 30 days from service of the notice or record of appeal. Service occurred on 10 March 2023, so the applicant had until 11 April 2023; the application filed 5/6 April 2023 fell within that period. The Court relied on its precedents confirming the mandatory nature of the proviso.

p. 3
02

Locus standi of non-parties to lodge a notice of appeal

Holding

The respondents, who were never parties to the ELC suit and never sought to be enjoined, had no locus to lodge the notice of appeal; Rule 77 does not permit strangers to appeal, and the remedy for an affected non-party is to first seek leave to be enjoined.

Reasoning

The Court applied its definition of locus standi in Alfred Njau v City Council of Nairobi and distinguished the Migwalla/Onyuka line of cases, which concerned estate beneficiaries stepping into proceedings after deaths of parties. Here the respondents were aware of the proceedings - demonstrated by a Land Registrar's visitation and their filing a notice of appeal two days after judgment, the same day the defendant did - yet chose not to apply to be enjoined as interested parties. Their approach was lacklustre and undeserving of indulgence.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A person who was not a party to proceedings and never sought to be enjoined cannot lodge a notice of appeal under Rule 77; a non-party whose rights are affected must first seek leave to be enjoined before appealing.
  • Striking out a notice of appeal or appeal is a discretionary, draconian power to be exercised only in plain cases, on the peculiar circumstances of each case.
  • An application to strike out a notice of appeal must be lodged within 30 days of service of the notice or record of appeal; failure to comply renders the application defective.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondents' Notice of Appeal dated 7th March 2023 is struck out
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court
Homa Bay ELC Case No. 47 of 2021 (O.S) (formerly Migori ELC No. 851 of 2017 (OS))
Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 44, 47 & 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (inherent supervisory jurisdiction over notices of appeal lodged in the Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mary Achieng Ngiela (suing As The Legal Administrator of Joseph Ngiela Mbori – Deceased) v Bernard Ouma Mboya & 1 other", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/706/eng@2024-06-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.