Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealOtherCivil Appeal (and Notice of Motion) arising from Nairobi High Court Misc. App. No. E024 of 2021· [2024] KECA 591 (KLR)

JMM v MNN (Civil Appeal (Application) E753 of 2022) [2024] KECA 591 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
24 May 2024
3,079 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal struck out an appeal filed late, confirming that blaming your lawyer will not excuse missed appeal deadlines.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appeal arose from a Children's Court maintenance and custody suit in which the appellant contested the paternity of the minor, and from a High Court ruling of Maureen Odero, J. dated 2nd September 2021 dismissing his application for review of interim school-fee orders. Rather than hear the appeal on its merits, the Court of Appeal dealt with two procedural motions by the respondent. The first, dated 14th November 2022, sought to strike out the notice of appeal; the Court struck it out as incompetent because it was filed twelve-and-a-half months after service of the notice, far beyond the 30-day limit in the proviso to rule 86. The second Motion, dated 2nd December 2022, sought to strike out the record of appeal filed on 3rd November 2022, over twelve months after the notice of appeal. The Court held that rule 84(1) mandatorily requires lodging the record within 60 days, that the proviso excluding certified time applies only where a written application for proceedings was made within 30 days and served on the respondent under rule 84(2), and that the appellant had satisfied neither condition. It further rejected the plea that he should not suffer for his counsel's mistakes, holding that responsibility for compliance rests on litigants. The Motion succeeded and the appeal was deemed withdrawn under rule 85, with costs of the Motion and the appeal borne by the appellant. The decision below was therefore not disturbed, and the High Court ruling stands.

Key legal issues

#
01

Mandatory nature of rule 84(1) timelines for lodging a record of appeal

Holding

Rule 84(1) is mandatory; a record of appeal filed 60 days after the notice of appeal, without extension of time or a valid certificate of delay, is liable to be struck out.

Reasoning

The timelines are intentional and purposeful, ensuring timely, just, efficient and cost-effective dispensation of justice. The exception applies only where the appellant applied for copies of proceedings within 30 days in writing and served the application on the respondent under rule 84(2). The appellant did neither, so he cannot rely on the proviso, and rules 85 and 86 consequently come into play.

p. 4
02

Mistake of counsel as excuse for procedural non-compliance

Holding

A litigant cannot escape the consequences of non-compliance by blaming counsel; parties must show interest in and follow up their cases.

Reasoning

If mistake of counsel excused non-compliance, the Rules would be reduced to hollow aspirations rather than statutory commands. Responsibility to comply rests on litigants; counsel are mere handlers whose technical skills advance the principal's goals. The familiar plea of mistake of counsel therefore fails in the circumstances of this case.

p. 5
03

Timeliness of an application to strike out a notice of appeal

Holding

An application to strike out a notice of appeal must be made within 30 days of service; a motion filed twelve-and-a-half months later is incompetent.

Reasoning

The proviso to rule 86 prescribes the 30-day window. The respondent's Motion dated 14th November 2022, filed after the notice was served on 3rd September 2021, came far outside that window and was struck out with costs to the appellant, although the later Motion to strike out the record of appeal, filed within 30 days of service of the record, succeeded.

Legal principles established

#
  • A record of appeal must be lodged within 60 days of the notice of appeal; the proviso excluding time applies only where the application for proceedings was made in writing within 30 days and a copy served on the respondent under rule 84(2).
  • An application to strike out a notice of appeal under the proviso to rule 86 must be made within 30 days of service of the notice of appeal; one filed late is incompetent.
  • Non-compliance with the Court's mandatory procedural timelines is not excused by blaming a mistake of counsel; litigants bear responsibility for their cases.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The respondent's Motion dated 14th November 2022 seeking to strike out the notice of appeal is struck out with costs to the appellant as incompetent, having been filed out of the 30-day period under the proviso to rule 86
  2. 2.The respondent's Motion dated 2nd December 2022 striking out the record of appeal is allowed
  3. 3.The appeal is deemed as withdrawn pursuant to rule 85 of the Court of Appeal Rules
  4. 4.Costs of the Motion and of the appeal are borne by the appellant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 4
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 82(1)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 84
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 84(1)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 84(2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 85
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 86
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2010rule 118
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022rule 84(1)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022rule 86

Cases cited (8)

  • Patrick Kiruja Kithinji v Victor Mugira Marete
    [2015] eKLR
  • African Service Maintenance Limited v Comarco Supply Base (EPZ) Limited & Another
    [2022] KECA 613 (KLR)
  • John Mutai Mwangi & 26 Others v Mwenja Ngure & 4 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v IEBC & 6 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Muzaffer Musafee Essajee & Another v Anne Njeri Mwangi
    [2021] eKLR
  • Joyce Bochere Nyamweya v. Jemima Nyaboke Nyamweya & Another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Mae Properties Limited v Joseph Kibe & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Habo Agencies Limited v Wilfred Odhiambo Musingo
    [2015] eKLR
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Family Division)
Nairobi High Court Misc. App. No. E024 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 (rules 4, 82, 84, 85, 86), on appeal from the High Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "JMM v MNN (Civil Appeal (Application) E753 of 2022) [2024] KECA 591 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Civil Appeal (and Notice of Motion) arising from Nairobi High Court Misc. App. No. E024 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/591/eng@2024-05-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.