Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KECA 436 (KLR)

Chief Officer, Lands, Housing & Physical Planning County Government of Mombasa & 1 other v Abdullah Ahmed Gele T/A Buxton Filling Station & 4 others

Court of Appeal of Kenya
12 April 2024
563 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal allowed Mombasa County's late appeal filing because both sides agreed in writing, showing consent can resolve extension-of-time disputes quickly.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was an interlocutory application, not a substantive appeal. The applicants, the Chief Officer, Land, Housing & Physical Planning of the County Government of Mombasa and the County Government of Mombasa, moved the Court of Appeal at Mombasa by Notice of Motion dated 13th September 2023 under sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 and Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution. They sought extension of time to lodge and serve a record of appeal against the ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa delivered on 27th March 2023, in which they were found in contempt of court orders, and sought that their record of appeal filed on 15th September 2023 be deemed properly filed. Counsel for the applicants attributed the delay to the lower court registry's failure to supply certified typed proceedings despite requests from 27th March 2023, and asserted that no prejudice would be suffered by the respondents. At the virtual hearing on 7th February 2024, counsel drew the Court's attention to a consent letter dated 20th November 2023 signed by the parties agreeing to compromise the application; the respondents' counsel confirmed that position. The Court accordingly allowed the application, deemed the record of appeal properly filed and served on all parties, and made no orders as to costs. The court did not engage with the merits of the intended appeal or the contempt ruling, and no decision below was reviewed at this stage.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to lodge and serve a record of appeal by consent of the parties

Holding

The Court allowed the extension of time application and deemed the record of appeal as properly filed, acting on the parties' consent letter dated 20th November 2023 confirmed by the respondent's counsel in court.

Reasoning

The applicants sought extension of time under sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, relying on delay attributed to the lower court registry in supplying certified proceedings. At the hearing, counsel drew the Court's attention to a consent letter dated 20th November 2023 by which the parties agreed to compromise the application, and the respondent's counsel confirmed that position. On that confirmation, the Court allowed the application, deemed the record filed and served, and made no orders as to costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where parties execute a consent to compromise an application for extension of time and the respondent's counsel confirms that position before the Court, the Court may allow the application on the strength of that consent without full argument of the extension-of-time factors.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 13th September 2023 be and is hereby allowed
  2. 2.The Record of Appeal dated 13th September 2023 and filed on 15th September 2023 is deemed as properly filed and served on all the parties
  3. 3.No orders as to costs
On appeal from
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Mombasa E.L.C No. 44 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2010 and Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chief Officer, Lands, Housing & Physical Planning County Government of Mombasa & 1 other v Abdullah Ahmed Gele T/A Buxton Filling Station & 4 others", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/436/eng@2024-04-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.