Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedApplication dated 7th February, 2024 (Election Appeal, Kisumu)

Ondari v Mangera & 2 others (Election Petition Civil Application E015 of 2024) [2024] KECA 205 (KLR)

Court of Appeal of Kenya
29 February 2024
1,761 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal refused to extend a 61-day delay in filing an MCA election appeal, confirming there is no second appeal from the High Court in such disputes.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Joel Ngugi, JA, sitting as a single judge) delivered on 29th February, 2024 on an application for extension of time to file an appeal against a High Court judgment of 6th July, 2023 (Chemitei J) which had allowed appeals and declared the 1st respondent validly elected as Member of County Assembly for Esise Ward, Nyamira County. The applicant's advocate had mistakenly filed the appeal at the Supreme Court; the Supreme Court (Lenaola, SCJ) allowed withdrawal without costs on 8th December, 2023 but declined to transfer the matter to the Court of Appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The applicant then waited 61 days before bringing the present application under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules. The Court held that while electoral timelines can in appropriate cases be extended, such extension is confined to exceptional circumstances given the constitutional value of timely dispute resolution. The 61-day delay was unexplained and inordinate; blame-shifting to the advocate covered the initial misfiling but not the subsequent delay. The Court further held that even if time were extended, the appeal would be futile because the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to entertain second appeals from the High Court on the validity of MCA elections, the omission in section 75(4) of the Elections Act being deliberate, as authoritatively decided by the Supreme Court in Hamdia Yaroi Shek Nuri. The application was dismissed with no costs, the respondents not having responded.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time in electoral disputes

Holding

Extension of time in electoral disputes is available but only in exceptional circumstances and where the dictates of justice so require

Reasoning

The Court endorsed Sumra Irshadali v IEBC and applied the Salat principles, holding that while courts can extend statutory electoral timelines in appropriate cases, the constitutional value of timely resolution of electoral disputes confines such extension to exceptional circumstances. The Rule 4 factors must be read against the Salat guidelines, including public interest.

p. 2
02

Inordinate and unexplained delay

Holding

A 61-day delay after the Supreme Court's refusal to transfer the appeal, unexplained by the applicant, is inordinate and inexcusable in an electoral dispute

Reasoning

Although the applicant blamed his previous advocate for filing in the wrong court, he offered no explanation for the 61 days between the Supreme Court's order of 8th December, 2023 and the application of 7th February, 2024. Given the statutory seven-day filing window for appeals, the delay was inordinate, making it unnecessary to assess the appeal's chances of success.

p. 3
03

Jurisdiction over second appeals in MCA elections

Holding

The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal from the High Court on the validity of election of a Member of the County Assembly

Reasoning

Both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have consistently held that the absence of a second or further appeal provision under section 75(4) of the Elections Act was a deliberate legislative choice ending electoral challenges to MCA seats at the High Court. The intended appeal would therefore be stillborn even if time were extended.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain a second appeal from the High Court regarding the validity of the election of a Member of the County Assembly, as the omission of a second appeal under section 75(4) of the Elections Act was deliberate
  • In electoral disputes, the Court of Appeal may extend time only in exceptional circumstances given the constitutional value of timely resolution of electoral disputes
  • The Supreme Court's decision in Hamdia Yaroi Shek Nuri binds the Court of Appeal on the absence of a second appeal in MCA election disputes

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 7th February, 2024 is dismissed
  2. 2.No costs assessed against the applicant as the application was unopposed
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya, Nyamira
Election Appeal (judgment dated 6th July, 2023)
Jurisdiction invoked
Rules 4, 82 and 90 of the Court of Appeal Rules; sections 3, 3A and 3(b) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act; Article 159 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ondari v Mangera & 2 others (Election Petition Civil Application E015 of 2024) [2024] KECA 205 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Application dated 7th February, 2024 (Election Appeal, Kisumu). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/205/eng@2024-02-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.