Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCriminal Appeal 290 of 2018

Ndiwa v Republic (Criminal Appeal 290 of 2018) (25 January 2024) (Reasons) [2024] KECA 45 (KLR)

Court of Appeal
25 January 2024
1,858 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal confirmed that attempted robbery with violence cannot attract life imprisonment because the law offers a lighter maximum of seven years.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
These are the reserved reasons of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Okwengu, Omondi and Ngugi, JJA) for the decision rendered on 26th September 2023 in Criminal Appeal 290 of 2018. The appellant, convicted of attempted robbery with violence contrary to section 297(2) of the Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Rongo, had his conviction and sentence upheld by the High Court at Kisii (Sitati & Korir, JJ.) on 14th March 2013. Before the Court of Appeal, the appellant withdrew the challenge to conviction and pursued only the sentence, contending the life sentence was illegal because of the apparent conflict between section 297(2), which prescribes death, and section 389 of the Penal Code, which caps sentences for attempts of capital offences at seven years. The respondent conceded the appeal against sentence, relying on High Court authorities that followed this Court's jurisprudence. The Court, guided by Evanson Muiruri Gichane and Boniface Juma Khisa, reaffirmed that where there is an apparent conflict between the two provisions, the accused is entitled to the less punitive punishment, the conflict itself being for Parliament to resolve. The appeal against sentence was allowed; the life imprisonment was set aside and substituted with a sentence equal to time already served (about twelve years), and the appellant was ordered set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held. The judgment binds subordinate courts and the High Court on the entitlement to the less punitive sentence where the statutory conflict arises.

Questions the Court framed

#

The issues the Court set itself to decide, in its own words.

  1. 1.Whether the life imprisonment imposed for attempted robbery with violence was illegal in view of the apparent conflict between sections 297(2) and 389 of the Penal Code
  2. 2.Whether an accused convicted of attempted robbery with violence is entitled to the less punitive of the two sentences prescribed by the conflicting provisions

Key legal issues

#
01

Legality of life imprisonment for attempted robbery with violence given the conflict between sections 297(2) and 389 of the Penal Code

Holding

The apparent conflict between section 297(2) (death sentence) and section 389 (maximum seven years for attempts of offences punishable by death or life imprisonment) entitles the offender to the less punitive sentence; following Evanson Muiruri Gichane and Boniface Juma Khisa, and in light of the State's concession, the life imprisonment was set aside.

Reasoning

Section 297(2) prescribes death for robbery with violence while section 389 caps punishment for attempts of capital offences at seven years. This Court in Evanson Muiruri Gichane held the conflict may only be resolved by Parliament but, in the interim, the offender is entitled to the less punitive of the two sentences. Boniface Juma Khisa followed the same jurisprudence. The respondent conceded the appeal against sentence. Accordingly the life sentence was substituted with time served.

p. 4
02

Scope of the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction as a second appellate court on sentence

Holding

Jurisdiction is limited to matters of law; severity of sentence is a matter of fact. The appeal succeeded on the pure question of law concerning the statutory conflict, not on severity.

Reasoning

Section 361(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code confines the second appellate court to matters of law, facts having been evaluated by the trial court and re-evaluated by the first appellate court. Severity of sentence is defined as a matter of fact (citing Samuel Warui Karimi). The appellant's challenge was framed as a legal challenge to the legality of the life sentence, which properly fell within the Court's remit.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where sections 297(2) and 389 of the Penal Code are in apparent conflict as to sentence for attempted robbery with violence, an accused person is entitled to the less punitive of the two sentences.
  • On a second appeal under section 361(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code, severity of sentence is a matter of fact and the Court of Appeal's jurisdiction is confined to matters of law.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal against conviction withdrawn and marked withdrawn
  2. 2.Appeal against sentence allowed
  3. 3.Sentence of life imprisonment set aside and substituted with a sentence equal to time already served (about twelve years)
  4. 4.Appellant set at liberty forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
  5. 5.Reasons for the decision of 26th September 2023 reserved and now delivered

The bench

#

One judgment of the whole court — no separate or dissenting opinions.

majority
majority
majority
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Kisii
HCCRA No. 176 of 2011
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 361(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (second appellate court, matters of law only); Rule 34(7) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 (reservation of reasons)

Quotable passages

#

Verbatim from the judgment, each located to the page it appears on in the official PDF — so these can be cited and checked directly.

Consequently, taking into consideration the confiict between section 297(2) and 389 of the Penal Code and taking into consideration the concession by the State, we considered this to be a fit case to set aside the life imprisonment imposed.
p. 4entitlement to less punitive sentence
We, therefore, substituted the sentence of life imprisonment with a sentence equal to the time already served (which was about twelve years) and ordered that the appellant be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
p. 4final orders / disposition
The apparent confiict in the law may only be resolved by Parliament. But the appellant is entitled to the less punitive of the two sentences.
resolution of statutory conflict pending parliamentary action

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ndiwa v Republic (Criminal Appeal 290 of 2018)  (25 January 2024) (Reasons) [2024] KECA 45 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Criminal Appeal 290 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2024/45/eng@2024-01-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.