Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Appeal (Application) E453 of 2023· [2023] KECA 1669 (KLR)

African Banking Corporation Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes

Court of Appeal
15 December 2023
863 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal paused collection of an Kshs.86 million tax demand against African Banking Corporation, but only if the bank pays Kshs.25 million within 30 days.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nairobi (SG Kairu, F Tuiyott and JW Lessit, JJA) on African Banking Corporation Limited's motion dated 21st June 2023 seeking stay of execution of the High Court judgment (Majanja, J., 31st May 2023, High Court Income Tax Appeal No. E014 of 2021) and setting aside of a demand of Kshs.86,076,985 issued on 13th June 2023. The underlying dispute concerns Excise Duty assessments of Kshs.46,482,463 on various bank transactions following an audit of the applicant's affairs for 2016 to September 2018. Applying the settled twin test in Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter, the court found the intended appeal - which contends that exported services are not excisable absent express provision in the Customs and Excise Act and that the Finance Act 2013 was wrongly applied retroactively - arguable though not necessarily successful. On nugatory-ness, the applicant argued the demand was colossal and would affect its cash flows, offering a bank guarantee; the respondent asserted it could refund and sought security of 60% of the taxes, citing Caltex Oil. Following Equity Bank v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, the court balanced the parties' interests and granted a stay of execution of the demand conditional upon the applicant paying Kshs.25,000,000.00 to the respondent within 30 days, failing which the stay lapses automatically and the respondent may execute. Costs of the application were made costs in the appeal. The decision below was not disturbed; the substantive appeal remains pending.

Key legal issues

#
01

Arguability of the intended appeal

Holding

The intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.

Reasoning

The applicant raised complaints that the High Court erred in holding exported services excisable absent express provision under the Customs and Excise Act, and in retroactively applying the Finance Act 2013. The court applied the settled test that an arguable appeal need not necessarily succeed, and found the grounds sufficient to meet the threshold.

p. 2
02

Nugatory-ness and conditions for stay

Holding

Payment of the entire demand pending appeal may affect the applicant's operations; a conditional stay with partial payment balances the parties' interests.

Reasoning

The applicant argued the Kshs.86,076,985 demand was colossal and would affect cash flows, offering a bank guarantee as security. The respondent offered to refund and sought 60% security, citing Caltex Oil. The court, following Equity Bank v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes, ordered a stay conditional on payment of Kshs.25,000,000.00 within 30 days, failing which the stay lapses.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant for stay pending appeal must demonstrate that the intended appeal is arguable and that it will be rendered nugatory unless the interim orders are granted.
  • An arguable appeal need not necessarily succeed; it suffices that it is not frivolous.
  • The Court may grant a stay of a tax demand on condition of partial payment to the revenue authority, balancing the parties' interests.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the respondent's demand granted conditional upon the applicant paying the respondent Kshs.25,000,000.00 within 30 days from delivery of the ruling
  2. 2.In default of payment, the stay shall automatically lapse and the respondent may proceed with execution
  3. 3.Costs of the application to be costs in the appeal
On appeal from
High Court of Kenya at Nairobi
High Court Income Tax Appeal No. E014 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent appellate jurisdiction to grant stay of execution pending appeal (rule-based motion under the Court of Appeal procedure)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "African Banking Corporation Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes", Case Analysis (2023). Civil Appeal (Application) E453 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2023/1669/eng@2023-12-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.