Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealAllowedCivil Application E093 of 2022· [2022] KECA 1413 (KLR)

Sister Mary Dominic Savio Akoth (on behalf of Franciscan Sisters of Saint Joseph (Asumbi) now Suing through next friend Sister Mary Goretty Achieng) v Tom K'opere trading as T.O. K'opere & Co. Advocates & another

Court of Appeal
16 December 2022
3,037 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal gave a religious congregation a second chance to appeal a land case, ruling its 40-day delay was honestly explained and harmless.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a single-judge ruling of the Court of Appeal at Kisumu (Tuiyott, JA) on a notice of motion dated July 10, 2022 seeking enlargement of time to lodge a notice of appeal against the judgment of Ombwayo, J of the Environment and Land Court delivered on May 6, 2022 in Kisumu ELC Case No. 64 of 2019, a land dispute over LR No West Kasipul/Kodera Karaboch/599. The deadline under rule 75 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2010 was May 20, 2022. The applicant, the Franciscan Sisters of Saint Joseph (Asumbi) suing through trustee Sister Mary Goretty Achieng because the originally named trustee, Sister Akoth, was in poor health, explained that its former advocate had been unwell and non-communicative, and that it first learnt of the judgment on June 22, 2022 through the area Chief. The respondents challenged the applicant's authority and candour, asserting the applicant knew of the judgment by June 24, 2022. The court rejected the objection to the applicant's standing, holding that since the ELC proceedings were brought against Sister Akoth for and on behalf of FSJ, another trustee could properly bring the application. Accepting the SMS evidence, the court found the applicant first learnt of the judgment on June 22, 2022, that the roughly 40-day delay was not inordinate and was credibly explained, and that the respondents showed no prejudice. Applying the Fakir Mohamed principles, the court allowed the application, directing that the notice of appeal be filed and served within 14 days and the record of appeal within 60 days thereafter, with costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Authority of the applicant to bring the application

Holding

The objection that FSJ as a body corporate should have applied was rejected because the ELC proceedings were brought against Sister Akoth for and on behalf of FSJ, not against FSJ as a body corporate.

Reasoning

The court examined the ELC pleadings and found the applicant was sued as a defendant in her capacity as trustee of FSJ, the substantive party. Since the problem originated in how FSJ was sued, it would be unjust to prevent another trustee, Sister Achieng, from acting for FSJ when Sister Akoth was unwell. Proof of her trusteeship, appointed May 2, 2018, was furnished.

p. 4
02

Date the applicant first learnt of the judgment

Holding

The court accepted the applicant's evidence that FSJ first learnt of the judgment on June 22, 2022, corroborated by SMS messages to its advocate, rather than June 24, 2022 as the respondents contended.

Reasoning

The supplementary affidavit fixed the date at June 22, 2022, supported by SMS messages of that date asking the advocate for help about an eviction order. Although the referenced mpesa transaction was not attached, the court found the deponent believable on the strength of the SMS evidence, rejecting the respondents' inference from the June 23 letter.

p. 5
03

Whether the delay was inordinate and excusable

Holding

A delay of about 40 days from the notice-of-appeal deadline, with action taken 18 days after learning of the judgment, was not inordinate and was credibly explained by the former advocate's illness and the need to engage new advocates.

Reasoning

Applying the Fakir Mohamed factors, the court found a plausible explanation: the applicant's former advocate had been unwell since April 2022, corroborated by an SMS from the advocate, and the medical report from Equity Afia did not contradict that evidence. The respondents' lengthy replying affidavit revealed no prejudice from the enlargement.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The power to enlarge time for lodging a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal is anchored specifically in rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2010, and its exercise is guided by the Fakir Mohamed principles.
  • Where a party is sued through a trustee, another trustee of the same body may properly step in and bring an application on the body's behalf when the named trustee is unable to act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated July 10, 2022 is allowed
  2. 2.The notice of appeal shall be filed and served within 14 days of the ruling
  3. 3.The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 60 days thereafter
  4. 4.Costs shall abide the outcome of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Appellate Jurisdiction Actsections 3A and 3B
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2010rule 1(2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2010rule 5(2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2010rule 4
  • Court of Appeal Rules 2010rule 75 (now rule 77)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010article 159(2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Fakir Mohamed v Joseph Mugambi & 2 others
    [2005] eKLR

    Restating the principles guiding the discretion to enlarge time for filing a notice of appeal

On appeal from
Environment and Land Court of Kenya at Kisumu
KSM. ELC No. 64 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2010 (invoked alongside sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and article 159(2) of the Constitution)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sister Mary Dominic Savio Akoth (on behalf of Franciscan Sisters of Saint Joseph (Asumbi) now Suing through next friend Sister Mary Goretty Achieng) v Tom K'opere trading as T.O. K'opere & Co. Advocates & another", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application E093 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1413/eng@2022-12-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.