Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application E042 of 2022· [2022] KECA 1379 (KLR)

Said v Abdulsheikh & 2 others

Court of Appeal
16 December 2022
1,557 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused a Mombasa property owner's request to pause his eviction because he hid key facts from the court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Mombasa (Kairu, Nyamweya and Lesiit, JJA) on an application under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 by Swaleh Omar Said seeking stay of execution of a judgment of the Environment and Land Court (Munyao Sila, J) delivered on June 7, 2022 in ELC Case No. 347 of 2017, together with an injunction restraining the 1st respondent from evicting him or dealing with two Mombasa properties pending appeal. The ELC had found that the applicant sold the properties to the 1st respondent, that the purchase price was paid in full, and had allowed the 1st respondent's counterclaim for vacant possession. The Court of Appeal applied the principles in Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Ketter: the applicant had to show an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay were refused. The court accepted that the appeal was arguable, a single arguable point sufficing. However, it found the applicant had failed to disclose two material facts: a similar application filed before the ELC on June 15, 2022, and a status quo order made by the ELC on June 16, 2022. Relying on Uhuru Highway Development Ltd v Central Bank of Kenya and Bao Investments, the court held that non-disclosure of material facts disentitles an applicant to discretionary relief. It also noted apparent forum shopping and the absence of any demonstrated imminent threat of eviction, the applicant already being protected by the status quo order. The application was dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents. The decision below was not disturbed; the intended appeal remains pending.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the intended appeal is arguable

Holding

The appeal is arguable; a single arguable point suffices and an arguable appeal need not necessarily succeed.

Reasoning

The court applied the Kinyanjui v Ketter principles, noting grounds including that the sale agreement was neither dated nor attested and that no evidence of payment of the purchase price was presented. It held an arguable appeal is one worthy of the court's consideration, not one that must succeed.

p. 3
02

Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory absent stay

Holding

The nugatory test was not satisfied; the applicant failed to disclose material facts and faced no demonstrated imminent eviction.

Reasoning

The applicant concealed a pending similar application before the ELC and the status quo order made on June 16, 2022. Non-disclosure of material facts disentitles an applicant to discretionary relief. Further, forum shopping and the existing protective order meant the court would not act in vain.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate an arguable appeal and that the appeal will be rendered nugatory if stay is declined.
  • Failure to disclose material facts when seeking discretionary relief disentitles the applicant to that relief.
  • A single arguable point suffices to establish that an appeal is arguable.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application is dismissed with costs to the 1st and 2nd respondents
On appeal from
Environment & Land Court at Mombasa
ELC Case No. 347 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Said v Abdulsheikh & 2 others", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application E042 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1379/eng@2022-12-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.