Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealPartially AllowedCivil Application E039 of 2022· [2022] KECA 1367 (KLR)

Chepkwony (Suing as the Administrator of Limited Grant of the Estate of Kaplachan Maritim) v Langat

Court of Appeal
8 December 2022
2,935 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Court of Appeal struck out an appeal filed one day late, confirming that emailing a notice of appeal is not filing and late filers must seek extension of time.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nakuru (Sichale, Achode and Korir, JJA) on a motion under sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and Rule 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, seeking to strike out the respondent's Notice of Appeal dated May 31, 2022. The underlying judgment of the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (Oundo, J) was delivered on May 26, 2022, so the notice had to be filed by June 9, 2022 under Rule 77(2). The official receipt showed payment on June 10, 2022 - one day late. The respondent argued that emailing the notice to the registry on May 31, 2022 constituted filing, and blamed M-PESA transaction delays and registry difficulties at the relocated Kericho courts. The court held that emailing is not filing; filing occurs upon payment, confirmed by the receipt. The alleged M-PESA delays and registry difficulties were unsupported by evidence and, in any event, could only assist an application for extension of time under Rule 4, which the respondent never made. Applying Supreme Court authority (Anuar Loitiptip; Salat; Teachers Service Commission), the court held that a notice of appeal filed out of time without leave is a nullity and must be struck out. The motion was allowed, the Notice of Appeal was struck out, with costs to the applicant. The decision below was not disturbed; this ruling concerns only the appellate process.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a notice of appeal filed one day out of time without leave is properly on record

Holding

It is not; it is a nullity and must be struck out, the only remedy being an application for extension of time under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022.

Reasoning

Rule 77(2) requires filing within 14 days of the decision. The official receipt showed payment on June 10, 2022, one day after the period lapsed on June 9, 2022. Emailing the notice to the registry is not filing. Following Supreme Court authority, a document filed out of time without leave is of no legal consequence, and the respondent never sought extension of time.

p. 3
02

Whether alleged M-PESA delays and registry difficulties excuse the late filing

Holding

No; such averments were unsupported by evidence and could only assist an application for extension of time.

Reasoning

The respondent blamed Safaricom and the Judiciary but produced no evidence of the M-PESA delays; he could have produced his own transactions for June 9, 2022. Where a party fails to comply with timelines, the onus shifts to that party to explain the delay through an extension-of-time application, which was never made.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A notice of appeal filed out of time without leave of the court is a nullity and must be struck out; the remedy is an application for extension of time under Rule 4, whether before or after the doing of the act.
  • Transmission of a notice of appeal to the court registry by email does not amount to filing; filing occurs upon payment of the requisite fees.
  • A notice of appeal is the jurisdictional key to the appellate court; without a valid and proper notice of appeal on record, the court cannot entertain an appeal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The applicant's Notice of Motion dated July 12, 2022 is allowed
  2. 2.The respondent's Notice of Appeal dated May 31, 2022 and lodged in court on June 10, 2022 is struck out
  3. 3.Costs of the application to the applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Appellate Jurisdiction Actsections 3A and 3B
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 86
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 77(2)
  • Court of Appeal Rules, 2022Rule 4
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010article 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010article 159

Cases cited (8)

  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 6 others
    [2013] eKLR

    Courts should spare parties the draconian approach of striking out pleadings (relied on by respondent)

  • Abdirahman Abdi v Safi Petroleum Products Ltd & 6 others
    [2011] eKLR

    Court excused a one-day delay in filing a notice of appeal; overriding objective and weighing of prejudice (relied on by respondent)

  • Joseph Kiangoi v Waruru Wachira & 2 others
    Civil Appeal (Application) No. 130 of 2008

    Support for respondent's argument against striking out (mentioned)

  • Attorney General v Lucy Nduta Nganga
    [2017] eKLR

    Striking out a notice of appeal is more prejudicial to the appellant than the respondent (relied on by respondent)

  • Kensilver Express Limited & 137 others v Commissioner of Insurance & 4 others
    [2014] eKLR

    Striking out a notice of appeal does not determine issues with finality (relied on by respondent)

  • Anuar Loitiptip v Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR

    Timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement that invokes the court's jurisdiction

  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others
    [2014] eKLR

    An appeal filed out of time without leave is a nullity; extension of time must be sought first

  • Teachers Service Commission v Simon P Kamau & 19 others
    [2015] eKLR

    A notice of appeal filed late without leave is irregular and of no consequence; lack of it cannot be bailed out by article 159

On appeal from
Environment and Land Court at Kericho
ELC Case No. 8 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 3B of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, cap. 9, and Rule 86 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Chepkwony (Suing as the Administrator of Limited Grant of the Estate of Kaplachan Maritim) v Langat", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application E039 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1367/eng@2022-12-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.