Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Application 13 & 14 of 2018 (Consolidated)· [2022] KECA 1328 (KLR)

Ngugi & 8 others v Kenya Planters Co-operative Union Limited & 6 others

Court of Appeal
2 December 2022
1,992 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to pause land proceedings because the applicants showed no risk of losing the properties while their appeal was pending.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Court of Appeal at Nyeri (Makhandia, Murgor and Tuiyott, JJA) dismissing two consolidated applications under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules seeking stay of proceedings in Nairobi ELC No 779 of 2009 and ELC No 1469 of 2016 and a temporary injunction restraining dealings with subdivided parcels of the former Kahonoki Estate, pending intended appeals from a ruling of the Environment and Land Court (Obaga, J) dated 22 January 2018. The applicants, who were interested parties and purchasers from the 5th respondent, had lost applications before the ELC in which they sought rectification of the register and injunctions; the ELC had held that one application was res judicata, having been substantively dealt with by Odunga, J. The Court of Appeal consolidated the two applications, found the intended appeals arguable - reiterating that one arguable point suffices - but held the nugatory limb unsatisfied: no danger of disposal of the suit properties or possession by the applicants was demonstrated, and the considerable time lapse since registration in the 6th respondent's name meant any injunction or stay would be an exercise in futility. The court also noted the applicants had not followed the ELC's advice to sue the 5th respondent directly. Both applications were dismissed with costs to the respondents. The decision binds subordinate courts and the ELC on the rule 5(2)(b) threshold it applies.

Key legal issues

#
01

Arguability of the intended appeals

Holding

The intended appeals of both applicants were arguable, not frivolous

Reasoning

The court considered the threshold in Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter and found the issues raised on appeal warranted the court's interrogation, without needing to rehash them. It reiterated that a single arguable point suffices at this stage.

p. 4
02

Whether the appeals would be rendered nugatory without the orders sought

Holding

The nugatory limb failed; no danger of disposal or possession by the applicants was demonstrated

Reasoning

The court found no demonstration that the suit properties were in danger of disposal or in the applicants' possession, and noted the considerable time lapse since registration in the 6th respondent's name. It also noted the applicants had not acted on the ELC's advice to sue the 5th respondent directly, making any injunction futile.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant under rule 5(2)(b) must demonstrate both an arguable appeal and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the orders sought are not granted
  • One arguable point suffices for the arguability threshold and need not ultimately succeed at the hearing of the appeal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Both Civil Application No 13 and 14 of 2018 as consolidated are dismissed with costs to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Court of Appeal Rulesrule 5(2)(b)

Cases cited (1)

  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui v Tony Keter & 5 Others
    [2013] eKLR

    Recognition of the twin principles of arguability and nugatory aspect for stay or injunction pending appeal

On appeal from
Environment and Land Court
Nairobi ELC case No 779 of 2009 as consolidated with ELC case No 1469 of 2016
Jurisdiction invoked
Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ngugi & 8 others v Kenya Planters Co-operative Union Limited & 6 others", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Application 13 & 14 of 2018 (Consolidated). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1328/eng@2022-12-02

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.