Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
Court of AppealDismissedCivil Appeal (Application) E034 of 2021· [2022] KECA 1150 (KLR)

Mereka & Co. Advocates v New Cooperative Kenya Creameries Limited

Court of Appeal
21 October 2022
1,181 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Court of Appeal refused to forgive a 24-month filing delay, confirming that COVID-19 and vague excuses no longer justify late appeals in Kenya.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Mereka & Co. Advocates, the applicant, moved the Court of Appeal by Notice of Motion dated 8th January 2021 under sections 3A and 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rule 4 of the Court's rules and Article 48 of the Constitution, seeking leave to extend time to file a memorandum and record of appeal out of time against a High Court ruling (Njuguna, J.) delivered on 22nd November 2018 concerning the applicant's Bill of Costs. The applicant attributed the delay to the deponent's medical absence in 2019 and 2020, the departure of assisting counsel to South Africa for studies in 2019, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The respondent, though served, did not appear or file submissions. Murgor, JA computed the delay at 24 months, of which a certificate of delay explained only 237 days, leaving 536 days unexplained. The medical explanation ended by October 2020 with no reason given for the failure to file thereafter; no evidence supported the counsel's-studies explanation; and the pandemic did not excuse inaction after the April 2020 e-filing practice directions. The draft memorandum of appeal, though said to be attached, was missing, so arguability could not be assessed. Holding the delay inordinate and prejudicial, the court declined to exercise its discretion, dismissed the motion, and made no orders as to costs given the respondent's non-participation.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules

Holding

The application was refused because the delay of 24 months was inordinate and unexplained

Reasoning

The court applied the settled rule 4 factors: length of delay, reason for delay, chances of success and prejudice. The certificate of delay explained only part of the period; medical absence ended by October 2020 with no explanation thereafter; counsel's studies were unsupported by evidence; and e-filing was available during the pandemic. Unexplained inordinate delay justified refusal.

02

Arguability of the intended appeal

Holding

The court could not assess arguability because the draft memorandum of appeal, though said to be attached, was not included

Reasoning

An applicant asserting a high probability of success must place before the court the draft memorandum of appeal. Its absence meant the court could not ascertain whether the intended appeal, concerning the applicant's Bill of Costs, would succeed, weighing against extension of time.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • On an extension-of-time application the whole period of delay must be declared and satisfactorily explained, and the discretion is exercised judiciously considering length of delay, reason, arguability and prejudice
  • The COVID-19 pandemic did not excuse filing delays after the April 2020 practice directions enabled e-filing and e-service

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 8th January 2021 is dismissed
  2. 2.No orders as to costs, the respondent not having participated in the proceedings

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Appellate Jurisdiction Actsection 3A
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Actsection 7
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 48
  • Court of Appeal Rulesrule 4

Cases cited (2)

  • Leo Sila Mutiso vs Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi
    Civil Application No. Nai 251 of 1997

    Guiding principles for extension of time: length of delay, reason, chances of success and prejudice

  • County Executive of Kisumu vs County Government of Kisumu & 8 Other
    [2017] eKLR

    The whole period of delay must be declared and explained satisfactorily

On appeal from
High Court at Nairobi
Makueni ELC No.1 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 3A and 7 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules and Article 48 of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mereka & Co. Advocates v New Cooperative Kenya Creameries Limited", Case Analysis (2022). Civil Appeal (Application) E034 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keca/2022/1150/eng@2022-10-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.